Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robroys woman
It better be simplified, or this could be a nightmare. I suspect that it will be interpreted simply and not take into account local taxes.

It's going to be a nightmare.

19 posted on 06/21/2018 10:10:04 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Poison Pill

As long as it’s just state taxes, not a big deal. Technically, people in those states are supposed to claim the purchases anyway. It’s really just shifting the responsibility. But now a small company in Georgia that sells a single item to some guy in Yreka, CA now has an obligation to the state of California.

I also have to say that $100,000 threshold is bogus. It should be based on something that shifts with the economy like, say, the minimum wage. It could be 10,000 times the federal hourly minimum wage.

I say that because of the mess caused by the AMT being out of date with income levels.

But this is just SD’s numbers.


33 posted on 06/21/2018 10:22:05 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Poison Pill

very quickly, hundreds of companies will come up with the software program where you put a ZIP Code or street address and get the sales tax rate. Of course it will require constant updating. It won’t be a nightmare for small businesses but it will be an extra cost.


124 posted on 06/21/2018 3:51:31 PM PDT by CottonBall (Thank you , Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson