[chris37]

They only thing that is wow about it is that it was 5-4 and not 9-0.

The activists need to go right now.

[shelterguy]

The 4 seem to compare this to putting the Japanese in internment camps back in WW2. It is fun watching the meltdown.

[SaxxonWoods]

Correct.

[toast]

If you think the dems are going nuts now, wait until RBG is up for replacement.

[cgbg]

The Supreme Court actually managed to conclude 1 + 1 = 2.

Pretty soon they may be able to figure out more complicated math. :-)

[morphing libertarian]

scary and predictable that 4 voted the president can’t do this.

This was a chance for Trump to have an andy jackson moment. From the first case in hawaii, he should have said the courts have no justification in national security and immigration and ignored the court action. He should have enforced the order immediately. If it was a serious issue it required action 14 months ago when he issued his restriction.

The narrowness of the margin is an indication that our security is in the hands of judges and not the CIC.

[FreeReign]

They only thing that is wow about it is that it was 5-4 and not 9-0. The activists need to go right now.

Yup. We have four anti-constitutional, activist morons on the SC.

The ruling should have been an easy 9-0. An objective caveman could have made it.

[Ancesthntr]

“They only thing that is wow about it is that it was 5-4 and not 9-0.

The activists need to go right now.”

---

Exactly. This should have been an open-and-shut case, as every other President exercising similar authority has gotten a similar thumbs-up from the Court (not because they were being nice, but because this is an Executive function authorized by prior legislation).