A common sense ruling by the appeals court slapping this district court judge down on his nation wide stay.
1 posted on
06/27/2018 9:56:37 AM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
“Chicago sued, saying the conditions weren’t part of federal law.”
Um, I don’t think sanctuary cities are part of federal law.
To: jazusamo
$200 million? Pfft! It is a start. Of course Congress is unlikely to amend existing law to allow the President to withhold financial aid to sanctuary cities that would truly force a change in policy.
11 posted on
06/27/2018 10:38:49 AM PDT by
buckalfa
(I was so much older then, but I'm younger than that now.)
To: jazusamo
18 posted on
06/27/2018 11:45:05 AM PDT by
Pollard
(If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
To: jazusamo
We need to stop sending all of the money to Washington just to have it doled at at political whim regardless of how it impacts issues important to us.
Think we can get the other side to agree to that. </sarc>
19 posted on
06/27/2018 12:08:13 PM PDT by
gunnut
To: jazusamo
A common sense ruling by the appeals court slapping this district court judge down on his nation wide stay.
No, a real common sense ruling would be - return these $$ to the taxpayers, because where in the Constitution can FedGov give any $$ to random cities? Much less sanctuary cities?
To: jazusamo
and the RATS, take another one in the.........HA ha!!!
21 posted on
06/27/2018 5:05:30 PM PDT by
Chode
( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
