Dear Kamala;
Trump is going to appoint a strong Constitutionalist. That’s not a way to destroy the Constitution.
You destroy the Constitution by appointing judges who do not abide by it’s tenets.
None of Obama’s appointees do. The Constitution means nothing to them.
We want it to mean something to our judges.
But then you knew that...
Trump is going to appoint a strong Constitutionalist. Thats not a way to destroy the Constitution.
You destroy the Constitution by appointing judges who do not abide by its tenets.
None of Obamas appointees do. The Constitution means nothing to them.
We want it to mean something to our judges.
But then you knew that..."
_____________________
.... beautifully said. Thank you for that.
I agree with you entirely. Did you see the descenting views on the travel ban case? They weren’t legal analysis....they were simply rhetoric and crisiticism. I wonder if the desenting judges realize they aren’t there to sit in judgment of a policy, only to judge whether said policy is legal? They truly came across as small minded legal nitwits when I read their analysis..
Look.......People can consider whether the travel ban was wise policy or not when it comes time to vote....and that includes the judges. If you don’t like the policy, vote against it next election. But, the wisdom of any policy is the last thing and SCJ should be considering when on the bench....and I mean that seriously.
Trump is going to appoint a strong Constitutionalist. Thats not a way to destroy the Constitution.
You destroy the Constitution by appointing judges who do not abide by its tenets.
None of Obamas appointees do. The Constitution means nothing to them.
We want it to mean something to our judges.
But then you knew that...
Mic drop. I got nuthin.
Kamala Harris is either the stupidest or the cruelest senator in America
“Dear Kampala,
Trump is going to appoint a strong Constitutionalist. Thats not a way to destroy the Constitution.”
In their warped minds upholding the constitution is destroying it. In reality they fear Trump restoring the constitution by stripping out all the liberal bullspit they love.
Of course, in practice, the Founder's model became the basis upon which the greatest, freest, prosperous and most mighty nation could rise in the shortest amount of time. The Left's alternative model deems the shifting whims of any age should be the determinate of what the "Constitution" means. . .which, of course, renders the Constitution meaningless. . and with it our endowed rights, freedoms and most importantly, our consent as a condition for governance. Simply stated, the Left is evil and are, effectively, advocating tyranny.
Their "Constitution" erases the concept of "WE THE PEOPLE" and replaces those words with "WE THE ELITES, YOUR BETTERS." . .as I said, the Leftists are great with words
The woman is a clueless left wing dolt.
In soggy-manure’s dissent to the travel ban decision, she never once brought up a Constitutional point. It was all her “wise latina” feelings crap.
That is destructive.
Ask her how many Constitutional Amendments have been passed in the last 50 years and why so few?
You will get a blank stare from her, if that.
But the real reason is its so much easier to pack the court with corrupt judges then to actually pass amendments.
That’s why the left uses the phrase “Living, breathing, Constitution.”