Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 11th_VA

I thought Sling was one of those “pay for what you want” deals. That being the case, why would they be in a price dispute. Just charge the illegals and the liberals who get the channel to be “chic” more for the privilege and be done with it.

Because, white privilege.


6 posted on 07/01/2018 6:17:09 PM PDT by ssaftler (It's not the "deep state". It's the "odoriferous oligarchy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ssaftler

One time I wish govt would get involved. Allow consumers to pick their channels and not have to subsidize undesired stations. Make it illegal to force me to pay for msnbc.


15 posted on 07/01/2018 6:46:20 PM PDT by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ssaftler

“I thought Sling was one of those “pay for what you want” deals”

They advertised as being a la carte (pay for what you want) TV when they first got going, which was a pure lie. As with satellite or cable, you have to buy their basic package, then pay extra for the good stuff. So you wind up subsidizing CNN in their basic package along with other crapola you will never watch.

Last time I checked, they never offered Fox news, not even as an extra pay channel.


21 posted on 07/01/2018 7:23:31 PM PDT by redfreedom (Gun control has proven success! (Such as in Hitler's Germany & Stalin's Russia))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson