People who make sweeping generalizations about people they don’t even know are usually “full of” something too.
I’m against appointing a woman just for the sake of appointing a woman. However, the asinine comments here directed at Barrett, simply BECAUSE she is a woman are the very definition of groupthink and hypocrisy. It’s exactly what the left does.
Barrett has a history of being quit Conservative. She’s was a Scalia clerk and pupil and her writing and history shows that she is in the mold of Scalia.
History is full of male “conservatives” who drifted to the left on the court.
To make insane comments like “women tend to evolve” when history has shown no such thing.
There have only been four women on the court. None of them evolved.
Ginsburg, Kagan and Sotomayor are and were hardcore leftists when they were appointed and they remain so.
O’Connor was a squishy moderate when Reagan nominated her, and she remained that way throughout her term on the court.
There are far more examples of males who were promised to be conservative who went full libtard after they were appointed.
No kidding
Why all this babe hate?
Hell who birthed these posters?
A right wing stork?
No some evolving woman I assume.
Barrett is a staunch New Orleans Catholic with SEVEN CHILDREN
and has made very conservative statements and is absolutely hated by the Left and media
Good choice fallopian or not
Plus she’s pretty as hell
Pretty women are much less likely to be bitter barren evolvers