Here is what Barrett had to say about John Roberts on OCare
... pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute. He construed the penalty imposed on those without health insurance as a tax, which permitted him to sustain the statute as a valid exercise of the taxing power; had he treated the payment as the statute did as a penalty he would have had to invalidate the statute as lying beyond Congresss commerce power [A] judge who adopts an interpretation inconsistent with the text fails to enforce the statute that commanded majority support. If the majority did not enact a "tax," interpreting the statute to impose a tax lacks democratic legitimacy it is illegitimate for the Court to distort either the Constitution or a statute to achieve what it deems a preferable result.
Chew on that all you women haters.
That’s pretty good. I like it.
Too bad she didn’t elaborate more and allude to judges taking a dive under the threat of blackmail by Obama.