“She is one of those gal judges who will “grow” and “evolve” with the role. She is full of “compassion” and “for the children”. “
Trump should not nominate her. She is a so called “so called conservative professor” at Notre Dame a very liberal college, that even covered up religious artifacts to suit Obama. There is no or little record of her decisions from the bench.Did she go to Haiti to adopt children to enhance her resume’ with the MSM? Why not adopt poor American children, of which there are plenty. How will she stand on affirmative action and open borders? We know how the Catholic Church stands on these issues. Is she up to the everyday battles of the major decisions facing our country or will she fold as Sandra Day O’Connor? We need a stronger pick.
Dittos on all you said! Don’t cave Trump! Don’t friiter away a Supreme Court nominee like George Bush loved to do. Remember when Bush was going to appoint his personal lawyer Harriet nobody whatever to the Supreme Court? Was this crazy or a Bushian drunken interlude or what?
_________
Miers started with Bush as personal lawyer - US news - The Changing ...
www.nbcnews.com/id/9577329/...court/t/miers-ties-bush-include-personal-lawyer/
Oct 3, 2005 - Supreme Court nominee described as very loyal to the president ... Harriet Miers, at the time staff secretary, is seen on Aug. ... In 2004, Bush appointed her White House counsel, calling her “a talented ... 1990s, he hired Miers to comb his background for anything derogatory that ... No one works harder.”.
Bush Nominates Longtime Friend and Attorney Harriet Miers for ...
https://www.democracynow.org/.../3/bush_nominates_longtime_friend_and_attorney
Oct 3, 2005 - President Bush has selected White House counsel Harriet Miers to replace ... as White House counsel and was formerly President Bush’s personal lawyer in Texas. ... President Reagan appointed Justice O’Connor to the Supreme Court. ... No one reaches a point in time such as this without tremendous ...
You may be caught up on this, but I’ll say it for anyone who might not know. The filibuster rule for Supreme Court justice confirmations is gone as of the Gorsuch appointment.
The Senate only needs a simple majority to confirm. And if I remember correctly, the Vice President can break a tie, if that happens.
Oh, and one more thing. Three Democrats in very pro-Trump states voted to confirm Gorsuch while knowing that many other Democrats would be angered or frustrated by their votes.
And it appears from the media that Democrats are focusing their noise against Barrett and the abortion issue. She might be harder to get confirmed than Kavanaugh or Kethledge. There’s also Thapar, but I haven’t found any record showing any decision on his part related to the Second Amendment, yet. Kavanaugh’s a big affirmative on the Second Amendment but nothing on Kethledge, yet, either (except one writer saying that he had been hunting).
While I like much about Barrett, I do wonder seriously about her views on border security simply because she felt the need to adopt outside the country when there are countless American children needing a loving home. Seems that adopting from Haiti or Africa is in the elite Hollywood playbook of “ I am so great”.
Pro life is crucial but pro life should protect the lives of those at risk to be taken by illegal invaders. Would love some clarification on her views.