Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NATO allies defend military spending amid Trump criticism
AP ^ | Jun 3, 2018 1:17 PM EDT | Lorne Cook and Jan M. Olsen

Posted on 07/03/2018 10:27:26 AM PDT by Olog-hai

NATO allies are pushing back against U.S. criticism that they are not spending enough on defense, as President Donald Trump ratchets up pressure ahead of a summit next week.

In the weeks leading up to the July 11-12 summit in Brussels, Trump sent letters to Norway, other European allies and Canada demanding that they boost spending. After Russia annexed Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula, NATO allies agreed in 2014 to end defense budget cuts, start spending more as their economies grew and move toward a goal of 2 percent of GDP within a decade.

In an email to The Associated Press on Tuesday, Norwegian Defense Minister Frank Bakke-Jensen said “Norway stands by its decision of the NATO Summit in 2014 and is following up on this.”

Norway has spent “far beyond” NATO’s target on new military equipment, he added.

The upcoming summit is the first major meeting since the fractious Group of Seven talks in Canada last month, and NATO officials are concerned that trans-Atlantic divisions over trade tariffs and the U.S. pullout from the global climate agreement and Iran nuclear deal could undermine alliance unity. …

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Russia
KEYWORDS: eussr; nato; tds; trumpnato; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2018 10:27:27 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If I’m Trump I bump that requirement up to 5%.


2 posted on 07/03/2018 10:29:06 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Are these nations truly our allies?


3 posted on 07/03/2018 10:29:24 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

People who are accustomed to getting handouts are always incredibly good at explaining why they must continue to get handouts.


4 posted on 07/03/2018 10:30:24 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If you want an answer, just look at the raison d’être for the European Union in the first place.


5 posted on 07/03/2018 10:30:41 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

The real reason for their “love” of Obama, Mr. Global Redistribution, is on display here. (Funny how he was so kindly to these colonial powers.)


6 posted on 07/03/2018 10:32:05 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

https://www.apnews.com/cad66c001b60431c8fc7a4be1563bac5/NATO-allies-defend-military-spending-amid-Trump-criticism


7 posted on 07/03/2018 10:32:30 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The German papers are reporting that Trump told the German government that US troops will be moved from Germany to Poland, and also cited reports that the Polish government is ecstatic.


8 posted on 07/03/2018 10:34:26 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Weren’t they supposed to have their own EU Military?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/25/nine-eu-states-to-sign-off-on-joint-military-intervention-force

Pull everyone out. Deal with countries that want us. For the most part, we’re the only country in the world that is completely self sustaining. We don’t need to import anything, when it comes down to it.

Set up partnerships with the Eastern European bloc: Poland, Hungary, etc. Let the man-bun liberals of Western Europe have their intervention force. They’ll be swallowed up by Russia in no time.


9 posted on 07/03/2018 10:34:57 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Be funny if the Russkies begged the Germans to pay up, so they wouldn’t have more NATO troops in Poland.


10 posted on 07/03/2018 10:36:55 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

Both the EU and Russia are attempting to divide those former Eastern Bloc nations between them (again), so that relationship better happen fast, because the intent for the EU’s military was always for aggression towards the USA.


11 posted on 07/03/2018 10:37:21 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
I hope Trump does not deploy American troops to Poland. Better would be to largely move American troops out of Europe entirely. Besides, how could an American deployment of troops in Poland be sustained without relying on a logistical network running through Germany? And American troops in Poland would be as destabilizing and provocative to Russia as a Russian army in Mexico would be to us. American forces in Poland is a terrible idea.
12 posted on 07/03/2018 10:42:08 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Foreign Ministers von Ribbentrop and Molotov, please pick up the Brussels courtesy phone ...”


13 posted on 07/03/2018 10:43:13 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Are these nations truly our allies?”

Nope. They are parasites.


14 posted on 07/03/2018 10:46:22 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

How is going to Poland terrible?

If the EU does decide to form a military, we do not need to cross the Atlantic or any other long distance to put a stop to it.


15 posted on 07/03/2018 10:52:42 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
The current logistics path is still predicated on defending West Germany. With the extension of NATO eastward, moving the logistics through Hamburg by rail or the Kiel canal might be an improvement. We can also work with Norway, Denmark and Sweden to improve defenses of the Skagerrak, or just pre-position equipment.

As to "provoking" the Russians, I can't think of a worse policy than allowing seizure of territory from Ukraine and tearing up the arms control treaties in Europe (INF and Conventional Forces treaties) without consequences.

You can make a case that US should abandon its overseas military commitments, but you should also realize the consequences: some serious increase in defense spending to ensure adequate, "close-in" defense of US territory and the guarantee that any future conflict will be fought at least in part on American soil.

Pick your poison.

16 posted on 07/03/2018 10:55:08 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

No. Of course not. They’ve made that obvious for decades.


17 posted on 07/03/2018 11:09:32 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

AWESOME! He and Reagan are by a mile the best presidents in my lifetime.


18 posted on 07/03/2018 11:10:49 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
I think in the long run, the more close in defense is the only sustainable model for a nation. I am a big fan of the role of “offshore balancer” and limited expenditure on the continent similar to the policy that served Great Britain so well for centuries until their blunder of 1914.
19 posted on 07/03/2018 11:13:54 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I think Europe can find a stable equilibrium with a much lower level of involvement and expenditure from the US. Empire and overextention killed Rome, Spain and France. I do not want our nation to follow.
20 posted on 07/03/2018 11:17:37 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson