Skip to comments.
U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
Mobile NYT ^
| July 8, 2018
| Andrew Jacobs
Posted on 07/08/2018 2:56:06 PM PDT by gattaca
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: colorado tanker
I know why they/we did it!
Daddies can’t! We demand equal rights for MEN!!!
41
posted on
07/08/2018 5:17:53 PM PDT
by
Flintlock
(The ballot box STOLEN, our soapbox taken away--the BULLET BOX is left to us.)
To: Reno89519
Agreed.
God designed the breast and its purpose.
A newborn needs mother’s milk if at all possible:
Immunoglobulin factors, probiotics, enzymes, essential fatty acids, as well as the optimal protein, fat, and carbkhydrate profile for a human.
42
posted on
07/08/2018 5:22:29 PM PDT
by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
To: gattaca
Knowing the UN they probably snuck some sanctions against Israel into this resolution.
To: A_perfect_lady
If that’s the case, the title of this article could read ‘WHO trying to block 3rd world nations from Baby formula supply’. Interesting how a title can spin the narrative.
44
posted on
07/09/2018 9:18:03 AM PDT
by
HollyB
To: Monterrosa-24
This is referring mainly to 3rd world nations where pumping may not be an option.
45
posted on
07/09/2018 9:19:07 AM PDT
by
HollyB
To: traderrob6
A truth that's told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent.William Blake.
46
posted on
07/09/2018 9:20:22 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
To: gattaca
.
The US is definitely in the wrong on this in a big way!
.
47
posted on
07/09/2018 10:16:35 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: traderrob6
Experience tells me that there is more to this story. There always is.
48
posted on
07/09/2018 10:19:30 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: gattaca
49
posted on
07/09/2018 10:20:26 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: gattaca
50
posted on
07/09/2018 10:45:38 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(President Trump divides Americans . . . from anti-Americans.)
To: Reno89519
“Seems like an odd decision and if based on marketing of infant formula, shame on us.”
Given that this is the NYT reporting, and also given that we are not provided the actual language of the administration’s requested changes, we must logically assume that this is simply another fake-news hit piece.
Until I see the actual language the administration was pushing, I’ll continue to give Trump the benefit of the doubt.
51
posted on
07/10/2018 10:02:00 AM PDT
by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson