Skip to comments.
Defiant Peter Strzok claims scrutiny over anti-Trump text messages 'another victory notch in...'
Fox News ^
| 12 July 2018
| Brooke Singman
Posted on 07/12/2018 7:47:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This guy is a smug, smarmy, dick.
21
posted on
07/12/2018 8:09:08 AM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Did you all expect anything more?! Come on people, this is the freakin swamp we're talking about! they planned and rehearsed thieir talking points for 2 years....they had lawyers at the taxpayers expense hired by Mueller to help and cover their asses in case they were caught! These snakes, these bastards, these swamp slime will never ever come clean! Let me put it this way the American people got royally F by these swamp creatures! Unless someone turns on them, which I doubt, they will walk scott free with a victory feathers on their cap! I hate, no, I despise, Sessions is the root of all of this effing mess! I'm seething 😤.. Worst part about it is that trump cannot fire sessions because automatically Rosenstein will become AG ..so we are so effing screwed! Trump has no other avenue but to ride it out for years!! So depressing and ticked!!!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Another highly partisan comment from the man who says he never allowed his politics to influence his work!
23
posted on
07/12/2018 8:23:20 AM PDT
by
Wiser now
(Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
To: clintonh8r
He’s intolerable. The Dims are trying to throw a monkey wrench in there every 5 seconds.
24
posted on
07/12/2018 8:26:45 AM PDT
by
GnuThere
To: E. Pluribus Unum
A defiant Peter Strzok said the scrutiny he is facing over his anti-Trump text messages amounts to just another victory notch in Putin's belt, according to the FBI official's remarks prepared to be delivered before House committees Thursday morning. How can he invoke Russia and then in the next breath say he cannot answer questions regarding Russia? Contempt.
25
posted on
07/12/2018 8:33:22 AM PDT
by
pepsi_junkie
(Russians couldnt have done a better job destroying sacred American institutions than Democrats have)
To: RoseofTexas
Just as I expected and it sure beats watching a soap opera but in the end, still as frustrating as ever with no real answers given.
26
posted on
07/12/2018 8:37:13 AM PDT
by
hsmomx3
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So if it is a victory for Putin, does that mean that this Hillary lover is a tool of the Russians? Does that mean that the Russian collusion was really all about the Hillary Russian connection and has virtually nothing to do with Trump or his getting elected, but has everything to do with Russia trying to overturn the election of Trump?
If so, what the heck is the Special Council wasting his time on? There is no Russian pro Trump collusion, it is all a cover story to hide the Russia Clinton collusion that didn’t work.
27
posted on
07/12/2018 8:55:22 AM PDT
by
Robert357
( Dan Rather was discharged as "medically unfit" on May 11, 1954.)
To: hsmomx3
Gowdy couldn't pin a SLOTH in a corner!! He doesn't even have a hat and certainly no cattle!
Democrats are LAW-LESS because Republicans are BALL-LESS!
28
posted on
07/12/2018 9:00:30 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Ann Archy
29
posted on
07/12/2018 9:11:41 AM PDT
by
hsmomx3
To: E. Pluribus Unum
the whole Russia Delusion Collusion Theory is a victory for Putin, thanks to the FBI, media and their dem lapdogs.
30
posted on
07/12/2018 9:13:39 AM PDT
by
euram
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I searched, but when the title is too long to fit in the title window and you have to shorten it, search fails.You don't want to search the whole title.
Just pick some unique key words such as "Strzok claims scrutiny" and there it is. Or, "Defiant scrutiny" will do it too.
Something like "Strzok messages" is very likely to show in several headlines, and when you try it you get over 20 hits.
31
posted on
07/12/2018 9:24:16 AM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
('Kill'-google,TWITR,FACEBK,WaPo,Hollywd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
To: Ann Archy
Gowdy couldn't pin a SLOTH in a corner!! He doesn't even have a hat and certainly no cattle!I gave up on Gowdy as well. One thing is certain, after the questioning, he'll hold a press conference to congratulate himself.
32
posted on
07/12/2018 9:37:32 AM PDT
by
CommerceComet
(Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So Putin knew you were having an affair with Lisa Page and that you all were going to be texting anti-Trump texts? Perhaps Putin is really God, Peter, if that is reality. Of course I personally don’t think he is, just like I don’t believe Putin tried to help get Trump elected.
To: CommerceComet
Gowdy couldn’t pin a SLOTH in a corner!! He doesn’t even have a hat and certainly no cattle!
I’m confused, just what judicial powers does the legislature have? Gowdy could recommend but that’s it. I was under the impression that it was up to the DOJ to bring charges.
34
posted on
07/12/2018 9:54:33 AM PDT
by
JayAr36
(Washinton DC, District of Corruption proven daily)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Listening to this Democrat Party/liberal fanatic this
morning, it's obvious he was placed into his FBI position
to cover for Clinton/Obama/Democrat Party illegal activities.
35
posted on
07/12/2018 10:03:11 AM PDT
by
StormEye
To: E. Pluribus Unum
He continued to whip the dead horse.
He was pathetic in his blather.
36
posted on
07/12/2018 10:05:48 AM PDT
by
bert
((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... In August our cities will be burning))
To: tennmountainman
No, it is not a mistake. What he says in such a pathetic rant is irrelevant. What he did is what matters and what will do him in.
37
posted on
07/12/2018 10:07:34 AM PDT
by
bert
((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... In August our cities will be burning))
To: RoseofTexas
No, you are wrong. To make such statement indicates you think the President is stupid. He is not stupid in spite of your depressing thoughts.
What happens today is focus on the witness and the hoopla raises the general consciouness. Congress can really do nothing besides present the debacle in person, in public. Later when the indictments are being handed out, the public will have some glimmer of rememberance of the reality that as presented by congress.
The witness under supoena wasw told unequvicolly to answer questions. He did not. He refused relying on the crutch of the FBI lawyer telling him not to.
He will probably be declared in contempt.
38
posted on
07/12/2018 10:15:14 AM PDT
by
bert
((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... In August our cities will be burning))
To: JayAr36; Ann Archy
Gowdy couldnt pin a SLOTH in a corner!! He doesnt even have a hat and certainly no cattle! Im confused...Apparently so, that wasn't my comment. I'll let Ann take up the defense of it but I agree with her that Gowdy has been good at little but pontificating. Has Gowdy ever made a referral to the DOJ? Has the committee ever uncovered anything that launched or furthered a DOJ investigation? What exactly have his hearings accomplished? I was solidly behind Gowdy at one time thinking this is the bulldog we need on our side but soon I realized that all this bulldog did was bark.
39
posted on
07/12/2018 10:41:17 AM PDT
by
CommerceComet
(Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
40
posted on
07/12/2018 11:52:24 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson