I read a legal analysis after Comey tried to explain why Hillary was not being indicted. The analysis said “extreme carelessness’” was not a standard for excusing mishandling classified information. That Hillary should have been indicted and that it was clear.
On that basis I have argued her to the point of being a ranter, that all Trump had to do was have sessions use Comey’s report and throw in the destruction of evidence and having unauthorized file servers and dicta her. She would be in her second year od prison by now.
I’d agree. I would further challenge anyone to provide a logical or sentential difference between “extreme carelessness” and “gross negligence”. Just because one is in the wording of the statute and one is not does not differentiate any sort of separate meanings. I think they have perfectly identical meanings.
I thought then and think now, that as long as HRC is unindicted, the entire legal system is an unflushed toilet.