To: yesthatjallen
The brainless twit. She would be good for casual sex, and nothing else. Like a lot of liberal women. Good for nothing more than sex toys because they are useless as human beings. Thank goodness for conservative women.
15 posted on
07/17/2018 12:42:26 PM PDT by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(End the Mueller Gestapo now. Free the Donald.)
To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
The brainless twit. She would be good for casual sex, and nothing else. Like a lot of liberal women. Good for nothing more than sex toys because they are useless as human beings. You may want to re-think that...
19 posted on
07/17/2018 12:51:58 PM PDT by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Not even good for sex.
First, not worth it. Second, if they have any personal information about you at all, such as a cell number, then the potential of having to deal with this idjit after the encounter is high.
Not worth it.
To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
“Good for casual sex” sounds like a euphemism for being patient zero of any number of STDs. Should have a warning label tattooed near the danger zone.
27 posted on
07/17/2018 1:20:38 PM PDT by
Two Kids' Dad
(((( Sessions couldn't find his own ass if Al Franken was grabbing it at the time ))))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson