Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Lisa Page revealed under oath that there was no basis for Mueller's appointment
American Thinker ^ | 07/20/2018 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 07/20/2018 8:35:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The Mueller special counsel investigation was launched to probe charges that the key FBI officials developing evidence in the case thought were baseless. That's a bombshell accusation that appears to have been confirmed by lovebird-turned-songbird Lisa Page, according to John Solomon.

It tends to confirm the suspicion that the Mueller probe is a cover-up operation to obscure the criminal use of counterintelligence capabilities to spy on a rival presidential campaign and then sabotage the presidency that resulted.

Earlier reports indicated that Page has been answering questions from the House Judiciary Committee quite frankly and may even have cut a deal selling out her ex-lover Peter Strzok over their professional misbehavior (and quite possibly worse) in targeting the campaign and presidency of Donald Trump with the intelligence-gathering tools of the FBI.

Last night, John Solomon of The Hill revealed that he has obtained information from sources who heard Page's testimony in two days of sworn depositions behind closed doors that she offered a bombshell confirmation of the meaning of one of the most enigmatic text messages that the public has seen (keep in mind that there are many yet to be released).

Writing in The Hill, Solomon explains:

[T]here are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read.

That passage was transmitted on May 19, 2017. "There's no big there there," Strzok texted.

The date of the text long has intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia campaign.

Since the text was turned over to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against the Trump campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Russia
KEYWORDS: collusion; fbi; fraud; lies; lisapage; lisapagetestimony; mueller; muellerinvestigation; strzoktexts; trumprussia; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: montag813

Drudge is getting low. Never go there anymore.


61 posted on 07/20/2018 2:59:01 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Scorned woman? Who knows what PS told her about his marriage, what he may have promised her, lies likely told her, how their fling ended...possibility.


62 posted on 07/20/2018 3:27:20 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
.......a bombshell accusation appears to have been confirmed by FBI lovebird-turned-songbird Lisa Page ....
tends to confirm suspicions that Mueller's is a cover-up scheme to obscure the Obama admin's criminal use
of the US counter-intelligence apparat to spy on a presidential campaign and then sabotage the presidency that resulted......

The Obama police state must be exposed.....the evidence is overwhelming.

PROOF POSITIVE THAT OBAMA KNEW----Obama’s CYA maneuver of January 3, 2017-——the signing of NSA Data-Sharing Order Section 2.3 by AG Lynch —— is the coupe d’etat to blow out The Deep State. Obama’s after-the-fact ex/order contains some unusual language particularly the convoluted language WRT “The Strategic Delay of Section 2.3 of Obama’s Executive Order 12333”:

NOTE WELL: Prior to the formal signing of Section 2.3, greater latitude ALREADY existed within the White House in regards to collection of information – especially in relation to the Trump Campaign. However, once signed, Section 2.3 granted broad latitude to inter-agency sharing of information.

But by the time Obama’s new executive order was signed on January 3, 2017, all that information was already in the possession of Obama White House.

Thus, Susan Rice’s January 20, 2017 email to herself takes on an even greater significance b/c no one was ever supposed to know about the REAL meaning of Obama’s retroactive CYA.....until Rice stupidly laid it all out in an official email.

==================================================

When Susan Rice stupidly wrote a CYA memo to herself, she inadvertently confessed to a series of crimes that added the time line and inferences about what the outgoing Obama administration illegally concealed from incoming President Trump and his aides. CYA memos are rarely a good idea. Most often, they reveal things the author never intended——ala Susan Rice’s now-infamous email to herself.

SOURCE powerlineblog.com

WHY SUSAN RICE WROTE AN EMAIL TO HERSELF........the extraordinary email Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote to herself at 12:15 on January 20, 2017........within minutes of President Trump’s inauguration must have been her last act, more or less, before she vacated the White House. So obviously the email was important to her. But why would it be important to send an email to herself (the only person copied was one of her aides)?

If you read the email, along with Senator Grassley’s letter to Rice, it is obvious that it is a CYA memo. But the question is, whose A is being C’d? Most attention, so far, has focused on the first two paragraphs of the email, which describe a meeting that occurred around two weeks earlier. The participants included

<><>Barack Obama,

<><>Joe Biden,

<><>James Comey,

<><> Sally Yates–who turns up like a bad penny whenever skulduggery is afoot–

<><>and Rice:

A HUGE RED FLAG---Rice made sure to underscore that Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book”. Rice writes Obama stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.

This is pure boilerplate. It represents, obviously, the Obama CYA company line.

But Rice did not write her email to cover Barack Obama’s rear end. If she or anyone else had wanted to document the claim that Obama said to proceed “by the book,” the appropriate course would have been an official memo that copied others who were present and would have gone into the file. (My guess is that such a memo was written, but we haven’t seen it.)

The important part of the email is not the paragraph that purports to exonerate Obama, but the paragraphs that follow: “From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”

The next paragraph of the email remains classified and has been redacted. The email concludes: The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.

CONCLUSION Why did Susan Rice send herself an email purporting to document this part of the meeting? Because she was C’ing her own A. Rice was nervous about the fact that, at the president’s direction, she had failed to “share information fully as it relates to Russia” with President Trump’s incoming national security team. Her actions violated longstanding American tradition. Outgoing administrations have always cooperated in the transition to a new administration, whether of the same or the opposing party, especially on matters relating to national security.

Susan Rice is far from the brightest bulb on the tree, but she was well aware that by concealing facts ostensibly relating to national security from her counterpart in the new administration–General Michael Flynn–she was, at a minimum, violating longstanding civic norms.

If she actually lied to Flynn, she could have been accused of much worse. So Rice wanted to be able to retrieve her email, if she found herself in a sticky situation, and tell the world that she hid relevant facts about Russia from the new administration on Barack Obama’s orders.

What were the secrets that Obama wanted to keep from the new administration? We can easily surmise that the fact that the Steele memo was paid for by the Democratic Party; that the FBI had to some degree collaborated with Steele; that the Clinton campaign had fed some of the fake news in the dossier to Steele; and that Comey’s FBI had used Steele’s fabrications as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign were among the facts that Obama and his minions didn’t want Michael Flynn and Donald Trump to know.

Susan Rice, we can infer, was told to keep these secrets, and if anyone ever asked why she had failed to disclose them to Michael Flynn and others on Trump’s team, or even lied to those people, she would have the defense that President Obama ordered her to do it.

There may be more to it than this. The redacted paragraph likely contains more information about what it was that Rice wasn’t supposed to tell the Trump team. One of these days, we will learn what was blacked out.

The fact that Michael Flynn was Susan Rice’s counterpart in the incoming administration may also be significant. We know that the FBI agents who interviewed General Flynn–even Peter Strzok!–reported that they didn’t think he had lied about anything. And yet, Obama’s DOJ and Bob Mueller’s “investigation”–basically a continuation of Obama’s corrupt Department of Justice under another, less accountable name–persecuted Flynn to the point where he finally pled guilty to a single count of lying to the FBI in order, as he says, to end the madness and the financial drain.

Why were the Democrats so determined to discredit General Flynn? Perhaps because they wanted to pre-empt any outrage that may otherwise have followed on revelations that the Obama administration’s National Security Advisor hid important facts from her successor during the transition, and may have lied to him about those facts, in violation of all American tradition.

63 posted on 07/20/2018 7:02:53 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Yes. And we thought Horowitz was going to save the Republic. Instead, it turns out he has no conscience either and sought only to save his Dem Cronies!


64 posted on 07/20/2018 7:07:22 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell.a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

“Yes. And we thought Horowitz was going to save the Republic.”

All he did was help to run out the clock!


65 posted on 07/20/2018 7:09:02 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: montag813; Matt Drudge

And the assclown Matt Drudge has NOTHING to say about this BOMBSHELL! Yet after Helsinki he bashed Trump relentlessly. What a traitorous pig you are Matt!

Matt’s been suffering from TDS, for some time, now :(


66 posted on 07/20/2018 7:12:47 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Great recap, as usual, Liz.

So....when do the frog marches start?


67 posted on 07/20/2018 7:14:45 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

By the way, where has Jeff Sessions been vacationing for the last year and a half?


Weekend at Bernie’s?


68 posted on 07/20/2018 7:16:07 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
A regular day in the Obama police state. Susan "The Sifter" Rice gets her orders from the commandant.

"Get me Penguin books' tax returns. I'm contracting with them for a book and I need something to bargain with..
Malia needs a job----get me something on Harvey Weinstein's sex life. Lois Lerner needs dirt on conservatives.
And get me the IRS files of Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi."

69 posted on 07/20/2018 7:17:41 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Yeah.....soon, I hope....but dont hold your breath.


70 posted on 07/20/2018 7:19:01 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AllAmericanGirl44

I use “the liberty daily”, instead of Drudge. I’ve visited his site just once in the last year.


71 posted on 07/20/2018 7:22:26 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

I beg to differ.

By all accounts, Lisa Page is a very smart lawyer and as such she fully realizes the penalty for perjury. She resigned from the FBI in May.

I view her as a married woman with children who let herself get involved in an office affair ... a fling, if you will ... with a married man with children.

It’s likely that their shared hatred for Trump was the “tie that binds.”


72 posted on 07/20/2018 7:27:13 PM PDT by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WIINNING WAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

P.S.

I'm sure Lisa Page is wise to the fact that the FBI never searched the DNC's server and that there's NO evidence linking Russia, that the whole damn thing is a hoax, just like Trump says, and the hacks came from China, like she's claiming.

BOOM!

Lisa Page had a fling, but she's a very smart and honest woman.

73 posted on 07/20/2018 7:31:41 PM PDT by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WIINNING WAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Jane Long
Explains the goofy, OMG! look on the Halfrican's face when he met Pres-elect Trump.

All the dirt Hillary was expected to sweep under the rug, was now in the hands of the man Obama tried to destroy.

74 posted on 07/20/2018 7:32:10 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Jane Long

Indeed.

Obammie had to figure that the smart billionaire businessman would unravel the conspiracy.


75 posted on 07/20/2018 8:04:58 PM PDT by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WIINNING WAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Liz

That moment 0bie’s chit-eating grin turned in to Oh, chit!!


76 posted on 07/20/2018 8:07:12 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Well, a woman's mind is something I'm not very good at guessing. It is:

...to me! :-)

77 posted on 07/20/2018 8:08:49 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (MAGAMarchOnWashington.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Give her IMMUNITY if she brings down Comey!!!!!!!!!
78 posted on 07/20/2018 8:08:58 PM PDT by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: onyx

"How'm I gonna get out of this mess with him as president?"
"I know .....we'll nail him with Russian collusion charges."

79 posted on 07/20/2018 8:10:54 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Heh.......that’s a great caption.


80 posted on 07/20/2018 8:14:09 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson