The idiots who are against the printing of the receiver component don’t realize you still need a metal barrel, slide, springs, firing pin, and dozens of other metal miscellaneous parts. You can alternatively buy a 95% AR which just needs a little drilling and tapping, a better choice, as I wouldn’t trust plastic components to stand up to the shock it will be subjected to.
You're being silly! No one actually reads anything anymore. At least not beyond a headline.
Mr. niteowl77
I’m a strong advocate of the First and Second Amendments and I fully support gun ownershship and use.
I’ve also made and used lots of 3D printed parts, both plastic and metal.
You couldn’t pay me enough to fire a printed firearm. I’m also an advocate for Life and I wouldn’t shoot one of these, because I’ve seen too many printed parts fail.
Journalists advocate for the interpretation of the press in the First Amendment as meaning - effectively - the Associated Press and its membership. That amounts to a claim that the press is either a title of nobility or an authoritative priesthood - the former expressly abolished in the text of the Constitution, the latter eschewed by the First Amendment itself.The First Amendment is properly understood as protecting the right of the people to spend their own money for the purpose of deploying technology (the printing press in the Eighteenth Century, electronic communications media as well, in the Twenty First) to promote their religious, political - or other - opinions and ideas. Anyone has the right to buy a printing press, without getting a government permit for it. Being in good standing with the Associated Press is not a requirement.
The link for Free 3D printable gun blueprints is:
www.codeisfreespeech.com
I have no printer, but I downloaded all 10 to show support for the First Amendment
Second Amendment has nothing to do with the matter undetectable gun were outlawed in 1988 30 years ago argument dead.