Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times defends hiring of editorial writer after emergence of past racial tweets
The Hill ^ | 08/02/18 | Joe Concha

Posted on 08/02/2018 11:46:24 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: yesthatjallen

Racially insensitive tweets? That’s is all the writer thinks they were?


61 posted on 08/02/2018 12:52:30 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I know that there are enough anti-white Asians, but for the most part, whites and Asian interracial problems haven’t really been “a thing”. In fact, the left has sneered at Asians for being a “model minority”, and “teacher’s pet”. I’d bet the NYT could easily have gone past 100 anti-white black racists to find an Asian one. This is an blatant attempt to sow division between whites and Asians, and don’t think it’s not, because at present, there really isn’t much. And that is also the left’s old standby tactic, to divide and conquer.


62 posted on 08/02/2018 12:52:32 PM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
"I engaged in what I thought of at the time of counter-trolling. While it was intended as satire, I deeply regret that I mimicked the language of my harassers," she said.

Try being a white conservative and using that excuse.

63 posted on 08/02/2018 12:53:44 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The good old NYT, which stands for New York Terrorists.


64 posted on 08/02/2018 12:53:50 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The New York Times is so openly dishonest, even their crossword puzzles lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MGunny

You may as well, for a lot of reasons. Firstly, it’s true. Secondly, the NYT itself has given the Good Housekeeping Stamp of Approval to racism (I know, not for whites, but fortunately they don’t get to control my language). Thirdly, according to the NYT, all you have to do is follow such language with a disingenuous non-apology and everything’s copacetic.

Therefore, I second you with another “She’s a racist chink”.


65 posted on 08/02/2018 12:57:39 PM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

See post #60. If she could not compete for a technology related job on her own merit, why not instead get the job by being the radical hate America minority that the NY Times celebrates.


66 posted on 08/02/2018 1:11:38 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

If I had an NYT subscription, I’d be canceling it. Maybe I’ll to cancel and let them deal with whether I have a subscription to cancel or not. Bet their phone lines are clogged with cancellations.


67 posted on 08/02/2018 1:21:27 PM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Yellow journalism is making a comeback

Obviously had bad breakup with a white guy or 2

49 is young but too old to be referred to as a young girl

Unless you count her callow immature stupidity regarding the
inventions of whites - this dope never heard of Edison Fulton
Gutenberg Bell Kepler Newton Faraday Farnsworth Salk
to name just a fraction


68 posted on 08/02/2018 1:24:33 PM PDT by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Stupid decision by NYT.


69 posted on 08/02/2018 1:37:17 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phil DiBasquette

She’s never even heard of the wheel (including the hamster wheel in her empty head).


70 posted on 08/02/2018 1:37:47 PM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: drpix

And even at that, I take Wikipedia (edited by leftists) with a whole shaker of salt.


71 posted on 08/02/2018 1:38:55 PM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

President Trump should revoke the Times’ press pass publically saying “I’m revoking their pass for the same reason Stormfront doesn’t get a press pass. No room for racists in the press area.”


72 posted on 08/02/2018 1:41:07 PM PDT by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

The point is that a “technology writer” should know the history of today’s technology, and were credit is due, with or without Wikipedia information/misinformation.

She obviously knows nothing.


73 posted on 08/02/2018 1:45:14 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: drpix

That is true, but as she is dismissive of everything whites (white males, actually) have done throughout history, I wouldn’t expect her to acknowledge even Wiki-depth knowledge of their achievements.


74 posted on 08/02/2018 1:47:01 PM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The RNC needs to tie her to the socialist American hating DemoKKKrats!!!! Helllllllooooo RNC!!!


75 posted on 08/02/2018 1:52:09 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

An everyday racist can be publicly dismissive of the real history of today’s technologies.

But to be a “technology writer” you must know enough about it to not make a public statement so clearly and completely wrong as to make a total fool of oneself. Saying she ‘can’t find anything whites can take credit for is’ is just that.


76 posted on 08/02/2018 1:56:08 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

She’s just jealous she wasn’t born a white male


77 posted on 08/02/2018 1:58:16 PM PDT by Waprotx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: drpix

I think we’re in agreement, I was just trying to string it out further. I certainly agree with what you’ve said, just adding to it. I’m sorry if I wasn’t clear, mea culpa.


78 posted on 08/02/2018 2:14:45 PM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Waprotx

It would seem so. It seems many people are jealous. They have to deny the truth that white males historically make the world go round, or they couldn’t stand themselves. Myself, I just enjoy being a (white) girl :)


79 posted on 08/02/2018 2:17:00 PM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen; vette6387; ZULU; NFHale; Kaslin; rodguy911

Rush gave the slimes a dose this a.m. Ya think NYT contact numbers, email, etc. should be posted on social media so they can receive millions of Deplorable calls?


80 posted on 08/02/2018 2:18:36 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson