Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge orders Trump admin to restart DACA program
The Washington Times ^ | August 3, 2018 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 08/03/2018 2:34:58 PM PDT by jazusamo

A federal judge on Friday said the government must restart the entire DACA deportation amnesty, including accepting brand new applications — but gave the administration a chance to appeal before his ruling takes effect.

The ruling by Judge John D. Bates is a major blow to President Trump, and creates even more confusion about his immigration policy.

Judge Bates said Mr. Trump and his Homeland Security Department do have the power to revoke the Obama-era DACA program, but they cut too many corners in the way they tried to do it.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; bordersecurity; buildthefence; daca; dhs; dreamact; dreamers; illegalaliens; immigration; judgejohnbates; masterbates; presidenttrump; resumedaca; trump; trumpdhs; trumpillegals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: rightwingcrazy

So if I go rob a grocery store and steal all the food, because I think it is a good idea to pass out the food to “the hungry”, then the grocery store owner has to prove that this was not a good idea on my part, to help these hungry people, right?

Is this a fair analogy?

This just disgusts me that a judge is so uppity as to think he gets to make the law instead of upholding the law.


21 posted on 08/03/2018 2:45:10 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

MAGA!

Support Free Republic, Folks!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

22 posted on 08/03/2018 2:45:26 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
No, just another gauntlet laid down before a man unafraid to be challenged.

Simply put;

The Judiciary just attempted to usurp the power of the Executive.

Pound sand, black robed muzzie.

23 posted on 08/03/2018 2:45:27 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Sadly, we have more walls (albeit temporary in most cases) going up around this president than we do the southern borders next to Mexico.


24 posted on 08/03/2018 2:45:28 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ignore the stupid judge. Just ignore him.


25 posted on 08/03/2018 2:45:56 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I think President Trump should ignore this judges activism.


26 posted on 08/03/2018 2:46:16 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists call 'em what you will they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Bump!


27 posted on 08/03/2018 2:46:38 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Super President Judge Master Bates.

Judge Bates said Mr. Trump and his Homeland Security Department do have the power to revoke the Obama-era DACA program, but still failed to convince him.


28 posted on 08/03/2018 2:46:43 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

WTF

Banana republic from the Bench.


29 posted on 08/03/2018 2:47:45 PM PDT by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

DACA has no legal basis.

The Kenyanesian Usurper made it up out of thin air.

Bush League Republicans refused to sue to stop in 2012 when they could have killed it before it got started.

Bullseye!!


30 posted on 08/03/2018 2:48:20 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

DACA was by presidential order. All presidential orders can be rescinded by the next president. That is the law and it is plain and simple.

I feel it is time for the president to defy the orders of Federal Courts and bring this immediately to the Supreme Court for clarifications.

Our lower Federal Courts have become activist courts outside of Constitutional Law. They must be held in check. The ninth court of appeals is the enemy of the people.


31 posted on 08/03/2018 2:49:08 PM PDT by cpdiii (Cane Cutter, Deckhand,Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist: THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Absolutely no authority to command anything.

DACA had an expiration date.

DACA was illegal anyway.

See if this judge can find a military to enforce his fiat ruling.


32 posted on 08/03/2018 2:49:11 PM PDT by SolidRedState (I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Based on what legislation?! It is not the court’s role to write law. These are illegal aliens, an unconstitutional program started by Obama, and all that should be left to discuss—since congress did not pass any law giving these illegal aliens amnesty—is how they are deported.


33 posted on 08/03/2018 2:49:13 PM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Everyone moans about this tyranny. But no one addresses it. Tucker or Laura might mention it in passing, but then it's on to the next segment.

I'm surprised that there is not an organized plan, a movement to end this tyranny once and for all. It seems to be "oh that's too bad (wink wink wink)". It's as though no one in any position of power cares.

And I'm surprised that the Trump administration doesn't fast track this to a higher court. Perhaps sometime next winter we will read that a higher court has voided this ruling. However that is part of the liberal plan—pile up enough obstructions to cause implementation of President Trump's policies to slow to a crawl.

There seems to be no one in the legislative branch who gives a damn to put a halt to this, even though their own powers are being usurped.

And President Trump should take a more aggressive proactive stance too. Bucking it to the Keebler Elf is an exercise in futility.
 

34 posted on 08/03/2018 2:49:16 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
...No, the judge wants to goad the president into a high crime or misdemeanor before the election...

Okay, so what would be the high crime here?

35 posted on 08/03/2018 2:50:33 PM PDT by jimjohn (2nd American Civil War: ongoing since January 20, 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Didn’t the USSC already settle this?!!!


36 posted on 08/03/2018 2:50:45 PM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

EVERY time Congress took up DACA legislation, they rejected it. Trump and the Courts have ZERO option but to deport these illegal aliens. Send them home WITH THEIR ILLEGAL PARENTS AND FAMILIES.


37 posted on 08/03/2018 2:51:19 PM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Executive branch should answer, “ nope”.


38 posted on 08/03/2018 2:52:14 PM PDT by VicVanleeuwenhoek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Donald Trump owes it to the American people and the rule of law to specifically dismiss this judge’s asinine, incoherent, ruling.


39 posted on 08/03/2018 2:54:45 PM PDT by TalBlack (It's hard to shoot people when they are shooting back at you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Didn’t the USSC already settle this?!!!

They may have. But if they have, this judge has overruled the SCOTUS and reversed their order. It will have to go before the SCOTUS, now.

40 posted on 08/03/2018 2:55:30 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The New York Times is so openly dishonest, even their crossword puzzles lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson