Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: semaj; Hugh the Scot

Are we talking about the speed of light here, or the speed of sound? There is quite a difference at those levels, and when we are limiting our discussion to phonons (speed of sound), I think my point stands.


62 posted on 08/14/2018 3:17:46 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: ShadowAce

*I* was only talking about this statement: “Mass is not a property that is affected by movement”.

Whether E=MC2 is applicable at varying speeds below that of light is a whole ‘nother matter of discussion. I weigh-in with old uncle Al that, yes, it does apply at the speed of sound as well.


64 posted on 08/14/2018 5:28:57 AM PDT by Hugh the Scot ("The days of being a keyboard commando are over. It's time to get some bloody knuckles." -Drew68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
"Are we talking about the speed of light here, or the speed of sound?"

I was talking about mass and speed in general. Once an object theoretically hits the speed of light mass is negated or inverted.

68 posted on 08/14/2018 7:30:01 AM PDT by semaj (U\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson