Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Next Big Bet In Fracking: Water
Wall Street Journal ^ | 22 August 2018 | Christopher M. Matthews

Posted on 08/22/2018 1:22:42 PM PDT by zeestephen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: McGavin999

Math error. Good thing I was pinged later. It’s 42 gallons in a barrel and 4 cents for 10 gallons of desalination. So just 16 cents to desalinate a barrel of water.


21 posted on 08/22/2018 3:24:06 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: palmer

If 4 cents per 10 gallons is correct, it’s just 16.8 cents per barrel.

However, you also need to dispose of the salt and the toxins, store the clean water, and transport it to the crops.

In any event, how much are farmers willing to pay for irrigation, and is the top soil any good in that part of Texas?

I’d be surprised if the Free Republic folks on this thread were the first people in America to think about this, which probably means that irrigation in that area is not commercially viable.


22 posted on 08/22/2018 4:41:53 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
I’d be surprised if the Free Republic folks on this thread were the first people in America to think about this, which probably means that irrigation in that area is not commercially viable.

It's viable, just not a lot of water.

23 posted on 08/22/2018 5:13:55 PM PDT by CedarDave (DJT: "Rather take a political risk in pursuit of peace than risk peace in the pursuit of politics.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen; LegendHasIt; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; OneWingedShark; ...
Good article and worth reading though the excerpt was too short. There may be some investment possibilities if someone can profitably clean up the water for recycling by the oil companies or for some other commercial purpose, including irrigation.

NM list PING!

I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics

To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keywords

To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages

(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for FR member use; its use in the News Forum should not be for trivial or inconsequential posts. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, scroll down to the bottom of the page to view the article for free after answering a question or watching a short video commercial.)

24 posted on 08/22/2018 5:18:08 PM PDT by CedarDave (DJT: "Rather take a political risk in pursuit of peace than risk peace in the pursuit of politics.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Enough that the waste water is toxic. Usually disposed by pumping into under ground salt domes.

Each company's frac fluid is proprietary information. Even the EPA does know what is used.

25 posted on 08/22/2018 5:22:12 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
One thing you may not have thought about.

Based on the article, it sounds like the huge amount of brine water is locked in just as tight as the hydrocarbon liquids and gas.

Once the hydrocarbons are depleted in a fracking well, the cost of extracting irrigation water would become untenable.

26 posted on 08/22/2018 5:35:04 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith
Toxic by Deep Green definition, not by any testing I have read.

If the EPA does not know, they must not have as good of laboratories as I thought.

The EPA has been overhyping toxicity for decades.

27 posted on 08/22/2018 6:20:51 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
If the EPA is not allowed on site or to pull over a WHP truck for testing, they will not know.

They can test a private water to find only natural occurring methane, but they will not detect anything else.

28 posted on 08/22/2018 6:33:10 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

The best thing to do with it is to tidy it up a little bit and frac the next well with it. Fresh water is scarce in the Permian Basin.


29 posted on 08/22/2018 6:44:00 PM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Fifty cents for 200 gallon from a large plant?


30 posted on 08/22/2018 7:16:13 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector
That may be the best bet, the big boys recycling their own return fluids for other frac jobs.

Testing for what they need to add to the mix at the Blender.

31 posted on 08/22/2018 7:21:50 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Have no idea what frac gel return would be like.


32 posted on 08/22/2018 7:23:21 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Looks like a watered down milky solution ? Seen this on lots of Farm to Market roads in the panhandle of Texas and wondered what it was ......


33 posted on 08/23/2018 3:55:31 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“Desalination costs 4 cents per 10 gallons. That’s $1.68 per barrel.”

Ah, I think I see it. That number should be 16.8 cents a barrel. A barrel is 42 gallons.


34 posted on 08/23/2018 5:18:28 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Proud member of the DWN party. (Deplorable Wing Nut))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

I have asked several engineers why we can’t frac with salt water. They say it has something to do with the ability to create gels that increase the viscosity of the frac fluid so that it can carry sand out into the wings of the frac. Some chemist needs to come up with a new mousetrap.


35 posted on 08/23/2018 10:39:11 AM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Try to take a saltwater shower ... lather (nope) rinse (nope)

Few seconds under fresh water all is good


36 posted on 08/23/2018 1:31:35 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Damn the Torpedoes! Full Speed Ahead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Salt water (heavy brine) is only good for killing a well.


37 posted on 08/23/2018 6:43:39 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

Sounds like my six years at school in Lubbock. A lot of bad hair days.


38 posted on 08/23/2018 6:52:03 PM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson