[raiderboy]

Well, done counselor. I doubt that there is a real person here.

[DesertRhino]

There’s a lot of sophistry and legalistic lingo being bandied about on this topic. But the bottom line is there is a spy on his staff that holds allegiance elsewhere than the USA.
A criminal probe is justified.

[demkicker]

The NY Times should be MADE to give up the name of this person if for no other reason than the outright THREAT made against our President:

“So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.”

[DesertRhino]

Although in reality, I think this is merely a publicity stunt designed to support the release of Woodward’s book. This is not actually an op-ed that came from a staffer. If it’s an actual human being, it’s a bitter Omarosa type.

[Jeff Chandler]

At the very least the New York Times should be persona non grata on any White House grounds

[DesertRhino]

In any case, according to the New York Times, They have a spy on Trump’s staff. I say take them at their word. The New York Times should immediately have all of their credentials for the White House Press pool, press conferences, Etc cancelled by executive order. No embedded reporters with any military unit. No access to any government facility for any purpose.

THEY claim they have a spy so i say take seen at their word.

[Tuketu]

Interesting. Not ALL sections of Sedition require force; but if you want force, the actions of Antifa Qualify. I suggest a review of all the ELEMENTS of each section's crime with possible evidence. (Possible in that the Internet does not constitute truth on its face, like the NYT; instead it furnishes leads.)

18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES § 2381 - Treason § 2382 - Misprision of treason § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government § 2386 - Registration of certain organizations § 2387 - Activities affecting armed forces generally § 2388 - Activities affecting armed forces during war § 2389 - Recruiting for service against United States § 2390 - Enlistment to serve against United States § 2391 - Repealed. Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330004(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2142] (Cornell.edu)

[bigbob]

Thanks for the straight poop, but this is more of a political than legal issue. The Times would love to martyr itself over protecting its source and Trump knows this so he will rattle the saber but won’t give them the opportunity. It would probably mean thousands of new subscribers, and he’d rather watch them fail.

[Sir Bangaz Cracka]

Hey, what a clever way, The Times, to fool Whitehouse Staff into turning against each other.
Libs are so clever, realizing conservatives are not skeptical thinkers falling for the bait every time. If The Times suggest a staffer wrote the article, then surely we have to believe that is true. I mean why else would they want to tell us something that is not true?