I am not giving her one iota of the benefit of the doubt until she attests to this UNDER OATH.
And if taking a sworn oath is now meaningless, the country has a lot bigger problems than this wench.
At this stage there is no upside to having public testimony under oath. Consider BJC lies under oath and not under oath did not stopped his fanatics from believing him and denouncing anyone opposed to him. With less intensity, the same could be said for Anita Hill... people still believe her, make a movie about her, despite the fact that her testimony could not be verified.
It should be process over substance now. DiFi is to blame if there is no hearing. She had ample opportunity but failed to raise this issue in a timely fashion. That was her decision, and with all the hearings, materials, background checks, etc, it is an abuse of process to obstruct the due process that is also owed to the nominee. To allow the allegation at this hour is very suspicious, in fact a dirty political trick by a veteran Senator who knows better. To reward such behavior makes any future GOP nominee very uncertain process and may actually chill getting qualified people to serve. The Dems need to be held to the BJC Standard that they set during his impeachment, including failing to address the claims of Juanita Broaderick.
The modern day Salem Witch Trials must end. I hope the GOP Senators are strong enough to stand up to this institutional corruption.