It’s not the evidence...it’s the gravity of the charge.
The gravity of the charge? The charge is that the girl was so stupid drunk that she made up a story in her mind to justify her bad behavior. If this had happened, she would’ve come home disheveled and the issue would have been resolved and it would not have been secret (kids talk). Think about it.
Yep-—the gravity of the charge ....an entire book could be written on this profoundly twisted (an fundamentally “legalistic”) development in our partisan political life. It’s the bookend to the corollary development of “the criminalization of political differences”-—all the more pathetic considering that there is really very little actual difference (in another development) between the two political parties (the “Uniparty)-—the biggest difference is that the Dems have perfected the procedures and the application of this particular kind of political dishonesty.
‘felt’ Kavanaugh wanted to take off her swimsuit.
By her own statement KAVANAUGH DID NOT TAKE OFF HER SWIMSUIT.
The woman ‘felt’ Kavanaugh wanted to rape her.
By her own statement KAVANAUGH DID NOT RAPE HER. NO RAPE HAPPENED.
The woman ‘felt’ Kavanaugh wanted to hurt her.
By her own statement KAVANAUGH DID NOT HURT HER.
-----------------------------
What if a rapist used the following (very similar) defense?
A rapists says he ‘felt’ the woman was coming on to him because of the way she smiled.
The rapist ‘felt’ she ‘wanted it’ because she didn’t push him away fast enough.
The rapist ‘felt’ it was OK because all women say ‘no’.
NO ONE WOULD BUY THE RAPISTS BS... AND IT SHOULD BE THE SAME WITH THE WOMAN ACCUSING KAVANAUGH. What matters is ‘what happened’ not what she was ‘feeling' about what 'might' happen.
ACTIONS MATTER... INTERNAL ‘FEELINGS’ might or might not have anything to do with the reality of what happened. ___________________________