It's clear DiFi wants to obstruct for weeks.
1 posted on
09/18/2018 10:19:18 AM PDT by
jazusamo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: jazusamo
It’s totally irrelevant. Shut her down!
2 posted on
09/18/2018 10:20:46 AM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: jazusamo
We need to find some path to start turning the tables on these scum. Diane Feinstein is crooked as hell, how about someone reporting her to Ted Cruz, for example? That sort of thing.
3 posted on
09/18/2018 10:21:31 AM PDT by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: jazusamo
As of today I now have a bottle of champagne with Dianne Feinstein’s name on it.
When she dies I will celebrate.
Hopefully I won’t have to wait long.
4 posted on
09/18/2018 10:21:51 AM PDT by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: jazusamo
Vote now.
The ‘Rats would if the situation was reversed.
5 posted on
09/18/2018 10:22:27 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: jazusamo
[ It’s clear DiFi wants to obstruct for weeks. ]
All the way to the mid-terms.
The Democrats are little more than a fifth column.
6 posted on
09/18/2018 10:23:14 AM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: jazusamo
I expect the accuser to show up on MSNBC and the View. This is making a mockery of the confirmation process. Proceed with the vote.
To: jazusamo
End the madness and vote this out of committee.
10 posted on
09/18/2018 10:25:56 AM PDT by
rdl6989
To: jazusamo
The GOP would never do it, but how about a hearing on DiFi’s relationship and activities with the Chinese communist spy who was on her staff for many years as well as all the Chinese business and money that has ended up in her family accounts.
11 posted on
09/18/2018 10:26:03 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: jazusamo
Witnesses to... WHAT??? The accuser b!tch only cites two or four, depending on whichever day it is..
12 posted on
09/18/2018 10:26:25 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Liberals, piss off. That is all.)
To: jazusamo
"Chairman Grassley said today there would be only two witnesses invited to testify at the Kavanaugh hearing next week on sexual assault allegations. Compare that to the 22 witnesses at the 1991 Anita Hill hearing and it's impossible to take this process seriously," Feinstein released in a statement. Actually, you mutant -- I stopped taking the process seriously after you sat on this accuser's letter for 2-3 months and refused to even mention anything remotely related to it when you were questioning the nominee directly.
14 posted on
09/18/2018 10:29:04 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
To: jazusamo
Unlike the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas accusations which were about an alleged pattern of conduct, this is about a single specific incident. Calling in a bunch of other people who did not personally witness what happened is pointless. The most they can do is repeat the hearsay statements of someone else.
Judge is the only other witness for whom there appears to be a valid basis to call. I'm curious as to whether he'd say "nothing like that ever happened with anyone", or whether he'd just say "nothing like that ever happened with Kavanaugh."
In any case, he should be the only other person even considered for testimony.
To: jazusamo
What about individuals who were previously told about the incident?Previously told by the woman who said nothing to anyone until the therapy session in 2012?
A contemporaneous witness would be relevant. But unless the dems are going to rewrite the whole narrative (and they might), there aren't any.
16 posted on
09/18/2018 10:29:49 AM PDT by
sphinx
To: jazusamo
The only people who should be testifying Monday are Kavanaugh, Ford, and the other guy she identified for corroboration.
17 posted on
09/18/2018 10:29:53 AM PDT by
MAexile
(Bats left, votes rights)
To: jazusamo
They’re not going to vote for him no matter what. They should just move on.
19 posted on
09/18/2018 10:32:57 AM PDT by
HarleyD
To: jazusamo
If the Dims are successful in blocking Kavanaugh based on a 36 year old unproven allegation, this will be their pattern for every conservative USSC nominee in the future.
This travesty has to be stopped.
To: jazusamo
22 posted on
09/18/2018 10:43:34 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
To: jazusamo
Her purpose is to show how tough and skilled she is so she can win in November over another Democrat.
24 posted on
09/18/2018 10:44:20 AM PDT by
alternatives?
(Why have an army if there are no borders?)
To: jazusamo
Yup. None of its germane.
And RINO Grassley hasnt sanctioned DiFi for sandbagging the committee.
26 posted on
09/18/2018 10:50:13 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Foreverits ba)
To: jazusamo
No one has been more vetted then this guy!
To: jazusamo
Shut this bitc! down and have the vote next week. If not we will lose Kavanaugh because of this communists Democrats.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson