Very well stated summation. I’d pose also the following? Is it hacking if said organization (DNC) leaves the door wide open Or in the case of Hillary non locked down non governmental server? It’s also possible DNC in the act of “diversity” hired staffers who are infiltrators. It’s likely plausible considering Feinstein and he China staffer for years
“Is it hacking if said organization (DNC) leaves the door wide open Or in the case of Hillary non locked down non governmental server? It’s also possible DNC in the act of ‘diversity’ hired staffers who are infiltrators.”
Good point. I wish I’d thought to ask him about the DNC server. I doubt that was actual hacking. As far as Hillary’s server, logic dictates that she did not intentionally allow her server to be “hacked” by China or others since the very existence of the server is something she did not want the public to know about. If she wanted to hand off state secrets to the Chinese government, she would have used less-risky methods.
DiFi’s case is a little different. It does seem reasonable to question whether this was convenient way to pass along classified information for sale. Same could be the case with the foreign nationals of radical ideology given access to (actually put in charge of) highly sensitive computer data.