Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: independentmind

Whelan was Scalia’s law clerk. He is not dumb.


Note that Whelan let it be known a couple of days ago that he had something interesting.

I don’t think he spent those hours since then taking a nap.

He has been working on this and I would suspect that he has had more than a few conversations with Garrett.

A person with Whelan’s reputation does not throw his friends under the bus. Also he would not turn a friend into an enemy who would sue his butt off for slander and in this case libel.

So yes, there is more to come. I expect we will all get to meet Mr. Garrett.

Further, Whelan knows what Garrett is going to say. Whether he says nothing happened or that he is the guy and so what stuff it......

Interesting.


62 posted on 09/20/2018 4:56:16 PM PDT by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so terrible, so disgraceful, that the federal government can not make worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: old curmudgeon

He’s good but Christine doesn’t want to hear the truth.Her homework is delay,delay,delay.


71 posted on 09/20/2018 5:01:32 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: old curmudgeon

Yes, it most certainly is.

I have serious doubts that there was a sexual assault involved. I am allowed to say that because I am female, and just a few years older than Kavanaugh.

Whelan can’t say it because he is a white male.


78 posted on 09/20/2018 5:04:14 PM PDT by independentmind (Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: old curmudgeon
does Whelan know Garrett?
100 posted on 09/20/2018 5:25:22 PM PDT by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: old curmudgeon

None of that matters. All he was really doing was proving that, even if there was an incident, it could have been a case of mistaken identity.

A 36 year old case of she said, he did, with no evidence and with her not even being able to say when or where is null. No one’s going to take that case as has been said.

Garret has nothing to worry about since he’s not the one going for SCJ. Just like you or I would have nothing to worry about.

It’s like some woman walking into a police dept saying I was violated 36 years ago,not sure of the date, somewhere - not sure - but I know it was this guy. The cops would say sorry maam but we have nothing to go on.

Plus they were minors.


138 posted on 09/20/2018 6:15:16 PM PDT by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson