Posted on 09/22/2018 9:40:56 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Whether there’s any truth in it or not, it’s the kind of thing people will say without any real evidence.
—
Just like Ford’s story.
bookmark
OMG, He was a preppie! And his family had money! Prep school culture! Vote Democratic! /sarcasm
That’s the only thing she claims to be certain of, despite the fact that she was dragged into a dark room and assaulted, and Kavanaugh is 35 years older. I’ve seen teenage photos of myself that I didn’t recognize. This is beyond stupid and into the nether regions of village idiocy.
Thanks. I remember reading that’s yearbook “expose”a few days ago.
It says “One friend, (identified briefly on social media) alleges Blasey-Ford (Holton Arms, Class of 1984) suffered no memory loss whatsoever in describing and bragging about her sexual conquests and paramours, identifying 54 sexual partners between her junior year of high school and enrollment in college.”
So, an unnamed sketchy source identified briefly on social media “alleges” CBF remembered 54”conquests.”
That sounds like a rumor a high school girl would start about somebody she didn’t like. Not much to go on.
I’m just kidding around. But, if there is any truth to the 54number (which I doubt), she was probably just starting g at age 15. Not that it matters.
Were there only a total of three or five people present at the “party?” I presumed at first she meant that there were only two other people in the room with her.
They are try8my to tap into what they think is the resentment against rich white boys. Remember the duke lacrosse business? Facts he d@mned.
Nobody on OUR side that matters cares either! Look at Cuckmeister Grassley bending over for Frau Katz, again and again!
That’s just about how my beloved husband put it. He was upset to think if it really did happen how she would leave another girl behind to face something horrible. Mind you, neither of us believe anything happened.... Just what a stupid story. I suggested to my husband that she never, ever, seriously thought the story she crafted would get out of the Senate Committee, figuring Judge K would withdraw his name. Because of said thinking, I don’t think she even thought to approach the other ‘witnesses’ about her story. It all went south when she didn’t get the traction she wanted... and once out of the bag, I don’t think she thought fast enough on her feet to get the most important witness, aka Leland Keyser, appraised on what she should be saying... just my thinking, on that part... Why would I think of Leland Keyser as the most important witness? Well, in the Yaya Sisterhood Of The Traveling Pants Society (as my beloved husband calls the Feminists), the female would naturally be the most important witness. Of course, they’d also assume she’d back Ford’s story. Not in this case, thankfully, did that happen!
Thanks ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas.
WP=stenography
“Student comment on Christine Ford from ‘Rate My Professor’ 4/19/2014”
https://twitter.com/cernovich/status/1040998438597550081
Your second is that the original fake story had the number 64, not fifty four.
Your third, might be that the guy who made the claim has closed down his account.
Your fourth, that the tweet is entirely unsourced.
You're dealing with one guy who just makes things up and one guy who carelessly repeats the rumor, mangling it in the process.
Seriously, try to get a nose for what is obviously fake news.
Same one.
#2. As the British crime shows have a policeman saying to someone they are questions, “If you aren’t honest with us, we will charge you with PERVERTING THE COURSE OF AN INVESTIGATION OR JUSTICE”.
I like that term, perverting, better than “obstructing” because it has a much more significant meaning.
The whole damned Democrat Party and their shisters have been “perverting and subverting the course of justice” since 2016 or earlier”.
Time for a Special Counsel to explore all the criminal and subversive/seditious activities of the Democrat Party, the DNC, their members of Congress re acting as obstructionists and fools on investigating committees, lying to the media and fellow GOP congresspeople, lying to the American people, and “covering up Democrat Party/affiliates collusion with Russian agents, i.e. the three Russian “sources” Steele used to create the dossier.
This includes any role that the Clinton Foundation has in money laundering to pay for the Steele dossier, through Coie-Perkins and Fusion GPS, as well as possibly payoffs to outside “actors” like Mifsud, Greenburg, Halper, etc.
IT would also include criminal collusion between the Democrats/organizations with corrupt officials in the FBI, CIA, DNI, State Department and in the Deep State leftovers of the Obama administration, including in the White House.
And that would only be the FIRST STEP in a series of real investigations that would put the DP in jail as an organization as well as most of its organizational and congressional leaders and staff.
Our prisons aren’t half filled, YET!
That “rate my professors” review was apparently scrubbed, but it wasn’t about her, but another Christine Ford who teaches at Cal State Fullerton.
#53. Once a skank, always a skank, esp. if a college professor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.