It's one of the most poorly written letters I've seen in a long time...looks like it was written by a 10 year old. And it was sorely lacking in information......which NOW leads me to believe that they were deliberately ambiguous...
It was going to be a pot luck attempt to keep Kavanaugh from an up and down vote.
Good catch on the 10 day time frame. As somebody pointed out on another thread, it doesn’t look like a letter a PHD would send out.
Even if Ford’s story were true & I doubt that it is,it is really irrelevant after this time. What’s hard to understand about that? Kavanaugh wasn’t running for Supreme Court when he was 17(or thereabouts).
[The letter sat in her office for ten days before it went to Feinstein? That tells me that Eshoo discused this with other people....likely Schumer....to discuss how they want to proceed.]
“Hey Chuck, how can we use this?”
In the original UN-reacted letter Feinstein finally gave to Grassley, the size of the font of first line of the second paragraph (”Brett Kavanaugh physically and sexually assaulted me during High School in the early 1980’s”) is strangely larger than the rest
Could this have been added later? Was there another name there replaced with Kavanuagh are was then whole first line added. This is not above the realm of possibility what Dems would do.