Posted on 10/01/2018 1:48:18 PM PDT by detective
I bet she has talked about this with the fam.
“This is a political hit job on Kavanaugh. Period.”
“Ford changes her story numerous times (also noted by Mitchell) to keep Kavanaugh from being able to refute her story as things unfold - it’s pretty telling. It’s also obvious the Mark Judge book was used to aid her in coming up with this story.”
I agree with you 100%.
The strategy is simple.
1. Create a vague, uncorroborated story from over 35 years ago that is impossible to refute.
2. Create the narrative that Kavanaugh has the burden of proof.
3. Get other women to make false accusations.
4. Create the narrative that if you don’t believe the women you are in favor of raping women.
4. Repeat the false allegations in the media and repeatedly say that they are credible.
5. Create the false narrative that because the allegations have been repeated Kavanaugh must withdraw.
The hypnosis observation is my conclusion based on Ford’s performance before the Senate. She used an artificial little girl voice and little girl body language. She memorized the false allegation against Kavanaugh and repeated it with conviction. She did not answer any of the other questions except with vague, childlike non answers.
She seemed like she was in a trance. Her voice and body language were not authentic or natural.
I saw a long article on this several years ago. Sybil and her therapist made most all of it up with an eye to a book and a movie deal and they got it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_(Schreiber_book)
bkmk
From another thread on this topic a poster nailed it:
Fffford was also asked by Rachel Mitchell if she had educated herself on the best way to get to memory, truth when interviewing victims of trauma ... best practices. The answer was “no”.
I’d say that was a lie in light of this info from Margo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGxr1VQ2dPI
At 24:55
Anybody give her a drug test. I wonder how many taps of acid she was on. She perjured herself several times and we will find out that all of the testimony was totally made up. It is right out of a playbook of political accusations. Total avoidance of hard facts except for the accused. The prosecutor lady got her to create several small but significant hard facts that all turned out to be false. Lulled everyone on the left into a false sense of security with her questioning.
She certainly appears mentally fragile.
That said, I have known women who have child voices that are otherwise just fine. Their voices just never changed.
This includes one woman who was constantly frustrated with her voice because no one took her seriously (very smart, large, and wonderful black woman). She had a child voice, but not demeanor though.
Mike Tyson isn’t exactly known for his manly voice.
Yes.
"Liar, Liar" - The Castaways - (youtube music video link)
"Liar, liar, pants on fire!
Your nose is longer than a telephone wire!"
#6 Make a distinction between Kavanaugh and numerous DEM/LIBS (Clinton, Kennedy, Ellison, et al) by continually saying the Supreme Court position is for "life."
(conveniently avoiding the Lib's MAIN Concern - the abortion issue - which is also for "life.")
Google glass. Interesting. I wasn’t buying those Dr.Magoo/Swifty Lazar/Iris Apfel frames either.
It gets even bizarrer. Ford’s grandpa and his secretary were shot to death in 1985. That would have traumatized anyone, much more than some BS teenage party incident in high school.
Crickets in the media re. this. Hmmmmm…...
https://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/better_than_bourne_who_really_killed_nick_deak/
But that Deak fellow sure had some strange connections. Someone should ask Ford what she remembers about him.
Let me guess - she was afraid of flying...
Her parents almost lost their home too...
I most absolutely do remember Betty and Barney Hill, because I met them when I was a kid, and Barney was still alive.
This whole Ford thing made me think of them, too. Both of them were as genuine as could be with regard to their experience. They fully believed what they were saying, and even showed us the pictures they had drawn.
They also described things that began to happen as their memories began to resurface, and the help they got through therapy.
Despite being 12 or so when I met them, there was something odd in their story that I didn’t have the knowledge and experience to identify. All I could say at that time was that I believed that they were telling the truth as they believed it to be, but what they believed wasn’t necessarily the truth.
Many years later I read the book about Candy Jones. The Hills came to my mind while reading it because there were a lot of similarities in the two experiences.
Now, I’ve mentioned Candy Jones in another post, and I mentioned doubts about her story. And the fact that she may well have been molested at some early point in her life, but her supposed symptoms didn’t fit the true picture.
I also mentioned how I thought she might be an operative, a sleeper.
Every5hing ties together in terms of her expression of artificial memory.
One of the reasons this line of thought stands out to me was because I’d once had a surgery that of course left me with no memory of the procedure. But years later, I began having some strange dreams. Eventually, I was able to connect the dreams with the surgery and realized that even if my conscious memory couldn’t recall, it was trying to, and my body remembered the pain.
That experience led me to really examine this whole Kavanaugh thing with different eyes. It was fairly easy for me to see what that game was all about. Except in Blasse’s case, the memories are false and were implanted into her in my opinion. Just like the Hills, and somewhat with Candy Jones.
i have not read any discussion of her professional training as a CIA instructor. What, do you suppose, she taught? What skills? What disciplines? Surely bringing contrived lives into a semblance of reality and effective deception are skills in which she excels. Her working relationship with John Brennan during his tenure as the director of the CIA explains much of her politics. It would be most gratifying if the FBI were to investigate these areas of her life.
“i have not read any discussion of her professional training as a CIA instructor. What, do you suppose, she taught? What skills? What disciplines?”
I don’t think it is possible for an outsider to answer any of those questions. What Dr. Ford did or did not do is not available to the public.
As to Dr. Ford’s political views, we know she was a left wing Democrat Party activist. We know she wore a pussy hat and marched against Trump.
All her history on social media has been scrubbed. I would guess there are many other parts of her biography that have been erased. Even her high school yearbooks have been erased.
I also suspect that Dr Ford was less than honest about her fear of flying, her supposed counseling, her polygraph, her second front door and her interactions with Senator Feinstein and others.
We only have small pieces of information about Dr Ford available. And most of what is reported about her is untrue.
All we know is that she supposedly likes to surf.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.