Posted on 10/03/2018 1:49:37 PM PDT by kevcol
She really wants to lie to the FBI. Interview her....
Well, Ford and her lawyers made the SJC jump through hoops like trained dogs, it’s not unreasonable for them to expect the corrupt FBI to do the same, seeing as how her friend, McLean, can help push the Deep State FBI to do their bidding...
She wants to refute her ex-boyfriend’s allegations. It obviously struck a nerve.
Seriously tho!!
Congress should “remind” her and her attorneys that it’s Congress’s job to “advise and consent,” not the FBI’s. Congress will decide if they want the FBI to interview her or not, and they’ve decided “not.” Now let’s have that polygraph data, or be charged with contempt of Congress, in addition to perjury for the lies about polygraph tests and obstruction of justice for the lies about flying.
She needs to fire this Katz dyke and get other counsel and then cooperate in good faith...
Maybe I guess call me skeptical. These people are so devious and seem to be 1 step ahead with Plan F when Plan A thorugh E have been deflated.
And that’s the attorney.
Subpoena
From the start, Ford and her Lawyers have tried to manipulate and control every aspect of this circus. That alone is a huge red flag and sows doubt to anyone who is interested in the truth.
Bait.
They are begging the FBI to talk to her because once they hand over their list of names they know they can delay this well past midterms.
Fortunately Trump’s people are smarter than her hack lawyers.
Grassley decided the timing to reveal the letter, I believe. The boyfriend sent it in before her testimony.
I don’t trust the FBI. I’m sure I’m not alone in that around here. ANY interview in this farce process is a COMPLETE waste of time. Which gives rise to a question: Why would the FBI waste their time with interview numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, but NOT interview the Ford? Why??
Am I being overly paranoid in suggesting that they would do that just to give the dems a talking point? LOTS of people will by saying, “Hey! Why did you interview persons 1 through X, but not interview Ford?”
What did the cop from that famous on line video “Don’t talk to the police” say?...”Every criminal wants to tell their story!”
Are you sure I saw the letter yesterday and it was dated October 2nd which was yesterday.
Remember when I said I wasn’t going to interview you? I lied...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7weXgmjoAzc
Occam’s razor (or Ockham’s razor) is a principle from philosophy. Suppose there exist two explanations for an occurrence. In this case the simpler one is usually better. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation.
The therapist’s notes may look something like this:
T: any history of abuse, physical or sexual?
F: yes, a minor event 35 years ago
T: were you hurt/raped?
F: no, just annoyed
T: did you report this?
F: no, too minor, plus I was drunk and don’t recall who was there
She needs a 2 x 4 upside the head.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.