She is an awful toad of a human being. No moral compass whatsoever.
I want to know where is the Turtle?
So, he’s a good man, and this process has been unfair to Kavanaugh. But having those opinions, she votes no, because of some amorphous larger issues at play??
So then, if liberal radical activists cause enough uproar, we will reject a good man for the Supreme Court, so that the anarchists will allegedly be placated about our courts being fair??
What am I missing? Does this reasoning make sense to anyone?
The speech Susan Collins gave indicates that she too was wrestling with this for a long time, but had made a decision long before walking on to the Senate Floor. Is that what we want, Senators who don’t know how they’re going to vote until the walk on to the floor.?
Your vote means nothing now. Nothing.