Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; justiceseeker93

A)An even number? And WTH does “7 Statutory and 7 Constitutional” mean? I heard some other d-bag suggest going down to 8, again an even number. I don’t get it.

B)It’s odd Ro Khanna calls himself a “candidate” since he’s an incumbent Congressman.

C)Meh, they need a President to pack the court (Maybe WE should pack the court?). And they need a constitutional amendment for judicial term limits (not a bad idea in theory but perhaps not to our benefit at this time).


32 posted on 10/07/2018 6:38:12 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Ping


33 posted on 10/07/2018 6:38:48 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Impy

I thought the judiciary implementation was left to Congress in the constitution and they made up the size and terms of service for the federal courts.

So no constitutional amendment required.


42 posted on 10/07/2018 6:43:00 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson