Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bellflower
The first thing we need to do is define "pre-existing conditions" correctly.

If you are insured and then apply for a renewal after you face a serious medical condition, this should not be considered a "pre-existing condition."

If you are insured and then change insurance carriers after you face a serious medical condition, then this shouldn't be considered a "pre-existing condition," either.

The only pre-existing conditions in medical insurance should be those that came up while you were uninsured. Insurance plans should NOT be required to cover those.

51 posted on 10/13/2018 7:55:19 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Simple and to the point. Excellent.


64 posted on 10/13/2018 9:05:24 PM PDT by gogeo (The Repubs may not always deserve to win, but the RATs always deserve to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

That’s the part they are not telling the country. For years now if you had insurance through your job there was no pre existing condition limitations. If you get fired, divorced from an insurance carrying spouse or etc. and become uninsured for a period of time, then you are considered to be uninsurable because of any pre existing conditions.
So people are encouraged to have continuous coverage to avoid the pool. If you can afford the high premiums you can have insurance if you’ve had continuous coverage. Obamacare lied and destroyed that system.


67 posted on 10/13/2018 9:14:55 PM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson