Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeauBo

Why isn’t he being charged with leaking?


6 posted on 10/15/2018 1:13:46 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tennmountainman

“Why isn’t he being charged with leaking?”

I guess he cut a deal to testify against others.


9 posted on 10/15/2018 1:14:53 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: tennmountainman

“Why isn’t he being charged with leaking?”

The intelligent question that you are not supposed to ask.


27 posted on 10/15/2018 1:34:41 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: tennmountainman

The leaking charge may yet come. They are charging him with a lesser offense of lying to investigators. They are keeping the leaking charge in their back pocket for leverage.

For anyone who doesn’t remember, this guy works on the Senate Intelligence Committee, and on the day they got the unredacted FISA application, he leaked it while it was in his custody before it was redacted.

How do we know? He texted her 82 times on that day, and the document is 82 pages long, unredacted. The Redacted document had only 40 or so pages IIRC that were not TOTALLY redacted. He wouldn’t have texted her pictures of black pages.


63 posted on 10/16/2018 9:55:56 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson