Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jagusafr

Sir, that was my point I suppose- the jury is the decider of fact. Bottomline- the child died because the woman left her in the vehicle after dropping off her own kid- not sure how a jury concluded that she was not (criminally) negligent to some degree- the minor nontraffic ticket that judge found her liable for not withstanding.

Correct me if I wrong, but negligence does not require intent, if it did then it would be a homicide of some sort...


32 posted on 11/14/2018 6:53:36 AM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Manly Warrior

You are correct, the standard for negligence is that someone knew or should have known that a particular action or failure to act would lead to a particular consequence and performed (or didn’t) the action anyway.


33 posted on 11/14/2018 10:49:16 AM PST by jagusafr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson