[CIB-173RDABN]

Follow the money. Someone gets a bonus for “saving” the school money (which can now be used to hire more administrators). /s

[yesthatjallen]

That's what I was thinking.

I won't expect food service costs to go down.

[Vigilanteman]

(which can now be used to hire more administrators). . .

. . . thereby costing the district much more than giving every kid a 64 oz. bottle of ketchup every day.

[Yo-Yo]

Follow the money. Someone gets a bonus for “saving” the school money (which can now be used to hire more administrators). /s

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that like most other schools, this school's lunch program has already been privatized, so this is a move by the contract holder to maximize profits.

[JimRed]

Follow the money. Someone gets a bonus for “saving” the school money (which can now be used to hire more administrators).

The cost per ounce of packets vs. pump dispensers has to be astronomically higher. Eliminating it altogether was the only solution!

[Pollster1]

Follow the money. Someone gets a bonus . . .

Half the time, this nonsense is financial corruption. The other half of these cases are petty tyrants enjoying pathetic doses of "power". Neither one should be acceptable to normal, decent people. We need far less government, and in particular far fewer restrictions on what kids may eat.