Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Loser Stacey Abrams vowed to file a federal lawsuit over the way Georgia’s elections are run. “It was not a free and fair election,” she said......

REALITY CHECK--- WALL STREET JOURNAL: Democracy Succeeds in Georgia
Despite loser Stacey Abrams' claims of voter suppression, the voting data in Georgia showed a record turnout.

By Wall Street Journal Editorial Board, Nov. 19, 2018

EXCERPT Republican Brian Kemp was declared Georgia’s Governor-elect, yet Democrats are trying to rob him of legitimacy by accusing him of stealing the election. The Democrats usual tricks---hoping to benefit politically by undermining faith in American democracy.

At the last tally on Sunday, Mr. Kemp led Democrat Stacey Abrams by about 55,000 votes or 1.4 percentage points. She finally acknowledged Mr. Kemp’s victory on Friday, though her non-concession concession makes Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump sound like gracious losers.

--snip---rest at WSJ web site

As Georgia's Secy of State, Kemp actually OPENED the voting process to MORE people----this hugely benefited Stacey Abrams.
She vainly tried to invoke the ugly spectre of Jim Crow, but Abrams would have lost by bigger margins were if not for Secy of State Brian Kemp's numerous pro-voting actions......including initiating online measures.

2 posted on 11/23/2018 10:05:08 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
Georgia loser Abrams is deeply in debt---and desperate......relegated to making a living off of losing;
keeps whining the Election Was Neither Fair Nor Free.

Abrams is just another hate-America factotum using the system to advance herself.
She has flatly rejected arguments that her whining about a stolen election erodes America's faith in the electoral process.

REALITY CHECK Since she’s deeply in debt, Abrams had to solicit big bucks to run a state-wide campaign.

Let’s see her campaign literature and her fund-raising methods.

What did she tell her campaign contributors to separate them from their money?

If she took money——but withheld information that she knew the election had been rigged against her -—
she was taking money under false pretenses......running a Ponzi scheme for herself.

3 posted on 11/23/2018 10:06:43 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson