Goebbels is smiling.
___________________
No WaPo bias there.
;-)
Yes, he is. Elfrink and the other author should be ashamed of themselves for writing such risible tripe.
Here’s what they are plotting at the end of the long Wa-Po story:
“Attempting to stop them short of the border appears to be just what Trump may be planning..... the administration is working with the incoming government of Mexico on a plan that would require asylum seekers to wait in that country while their claims moved through U.S. courts.”
[Trump] could try to invoke an exception to the law called “safe third country,” which permits the government to keep asylum seekers in another country, in this case Mexico, under a bilateral agreement while their claims are being considered in the United States.”
—> However, there are several catches, according to ACLU immigration attorney, Lee Gelernt.
The law says, “there needs to be an assurance that individuals waiting on the Mexican side are safe, not just from the Mexican government but from gangs” and others. “We believe it would be IMPOSSIBLE for the U.S.” to make that assurance, he added.
My comment: They have been living on the Mexican roads and in public places, perfectly unharmed, nice and safe for 40 days. Why should they be deemed unsafe, now? There is no US travel advisory to avoid Tijuana. Thousands of Americans cross the SD/TJ border every day. If it’s safe enough for Americans, it’s good enough for them, too. The safe way would have been to apply for asylum in Central America.
(((Hey Honduran mama,))) for the safety of the little girls you posed for the Reuters camera guy:
“Put the free shoes back on the girls feet before they are cut and bleeding with infections from the dirt and sewage.”
“Diapers are $$ and smelly, tell their real mother to potty-train these 4 & 5 year olds as a matter of decency & hygiene.”
“Put some pants on the girls to provide modesty and protection from the wondering eyes of thousands of men dominating your horde.”
“Most importantly, How much did WaPo or Reuters pay you to drag the girls around for the camera?”
Yeah right - the photo was a set up by a democrat who was hoping a child would be hit by a gas canister and die.... more pity for their commie cause. These liberals are evil - they should not be using children as props... evil ... pure and simple.