Dammit, there’s no hope. Like a famous website says, “Don’t think you can vote your way out of this.”
why would Kav vote to hear
a case he knows he will lose?
Kavanaugh dissented on the decision that allowed the 17 year old illegal to get a free elective abortion. I think we are good with Kavanaugh and have a little patience.
ITS A DAMN DIRTY SHAME....
“At least McScrotum is great at getting Trump’s judges passed”—repeated ad nauseum by oxy using morons.
Well the new justice is now 0 for 1 as far as I am concerned. Roberts, well, we all know how he voted for Obamacare, so no real surprise by that fool. I do not consider Roberts a conservative. He is not like our true conservatives on the court.
Kavanaugh ping
Ping
Most likely a very smart decision by Kavanaugh.
It’ll get the dems scratching their heads and make the deep state politicians breathe a sigh of relief.
As someone mentioned up thread, he’ll wait until another conservative justice is confirmed and a real good case comes up that the right action by the Supremes can be much more effective to protect future dead babies.
The courts have no authority to meddle in the states’ decisions about funding.
Great! I’m going to start a “woman’s health center” in my place and file for Medicaid funds.
Yo, legalized murder has the right o be funded.... /s
Kavanaugh is a Bush Deep State CINO, who clerked for CINO Kennedy.
Roberts is a Bush Deep State CINO, who clerked for CINO Kennedy.
Pro abortion Susan Collins said today Kavanaugh’s vote today vindicated her support for him and she’s exactly right. As long as Kavanaugh and closeted Roberts remain on the court they’ll be reliable lib votes on abortion and anything to do with homosexual “rights”.
>> Roberts and Kavanaugh “likely have serious objections,”
Well, Roberts seems to enjoy punitive taxation...
Not sure what crawled up Kavanaugh’s ass.
Are we tired of winning yet?
Another article:
“,,Thomas said the court made a “mess” of the matter, and blamed the other justices for not wanting to touch a case involving the abortion giant Planned Parenthood.
“What explains the court’s refusal to do its job here? I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood,’” Thomas wrote in his dissenting opinion. ..”
excerpt from: