Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bubbacluck

> I am pretty sure the Supreme Court has ruled on this already. Police do not have an obligation to protect us from harm. <

But I wonder how broad that ruling was. Is there a difference between the cops not responding for whatever reason, and a cop being on-scene, but doing nothing?

Because the Supreme Court ruling was about the former. Cops didn’t respond to a plea for help. But in the Parkland case, the cop was right there. And he knew for an absolute fact that his help was needed. That’s depraved indifference in my book.

Here’s an article about that Supreme court ruling.

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html


17 posted on 12/12/2018 2:59:52 PM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right

Is there a difference between a “Sheriff” and a “Police Officer”? And did SCOTUS use the term “police” in a broad sense or a narrow one?


24 posted on 12/12/2018 3:09:19 PM PST by rednesss (fascism is the union,marriage,merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

The court also ruled that once on scene cops have no duty to take heroic measures.


54 posted on 12/12/2018 8:04:22 PM PST by CodeToad ( Hating on Trump is hating on me and America!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson