To: Para-Ord.45
Comprehensive Net Neutrality would have been more effective. /s
2 posted on
01/08/2019 8:10:29 AM PST by
blackdog
To: Para-Ord.45
The party that cried "Wolf!"
One of the Democratic commissioners on the FCC claimed that repealing "net neutrality" would "green light to our nation's largest broadband providers to engage in anti-consumer practices, including blocking, slowing down traffic, and paid prioritization of online applications and services." [...]
A year later, none of the horror stories came true. In fact, average internet speeds climbed by roughly a third last year. The number of homes with access to fiber internet jumped 23% last year, according to the Fiber Broadband Association.
3 posted on
01/08/2019 8:15:31 AM PST by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: Para-Ord.45
"Repealing net neutrality regulations would be the final pillow in (the internets) face, said The New York Times. The ACLU said it risks erosion of the biggest free-speech platform the world has ever known. CNET declared that net neutrality repeal means your internet may never be the same. CNN labeled repeal the end of the internet as we know it.
Tech companies colluding to deplatform conservatives is totally legitimate because it would be wrong for any FCC regulation against this....Open internet is a dog whistle for white supremacy!!!!
4 posted on
01/08/2019 8:20:05 AM PST by
VanDeKoik
To: Para-Ord.45
Quinn's First Law:
Liberalism always results in the exact opposite of it's stated intent. {it never fails}
5 posted on
01/08/2019 8:22:01 AM PST by
USS Alaska
(Nuke all mooselimb terrorists, today.)
To: Para-Ord.45
Facts don’t matter. They’ll be BAAAAAA-AAAACK!
To: Para-Ord.45
7 posted on
01/08/2019 8:26:07 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Para-Ord.45
My question was — was Google included in the registration and if not, why?
8 posted on
01/08/2019 8:40:12 AM PST by
dhs12345
To: Para-Ord.45
There were many, many dumbasses on Free Republic that supported NN.
And they were supporting content providers over those who actually developed and built the Internet. They were supporting Google, FaceBook and all the commies, over AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and all the backbone providers and builders.
They just didn’t want these companies to make a profit off their hundreds of billions of dollars in investment. Investment that actually BUILT THE WHOLE FRIGGIN’ INTERNET.
And it’s because, deep down inside they are commies too.
9 posted on
01/08/2019 8:41:14 AM PST by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Para-Ord.45
Silicon Valley had a new startup in mind to police the Internet.
Internet Neutrality would have given them the weapon to turn it on.
Fake News is only a sample of what they had in mind.
14 posted on
01/08/2019 9:02:09 AM PST by
Zathras
To: Para-Ord.45
Net neutrality was part of a commie larger plan... It never had anything to do with freedom - it was always about control.
15 posted on
01/08/2019 9:06:52 AM PST by
GOPJ
(Whole towns in flyover died when jobs left for China. DC didn't gave a damn-now they want OUR tears?)
To: Para-Ord.45
Because NN was all about censorship. Thank God once again that Hillary lost.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson