If you need to emphasize so much, maybe your message is lacking a bit. Just my opinion
**********************************************
Well, I hope that you think it is urgent to get our Senators (and the staffers who the President assigned responsibility to round up good nominees) actually focused on the need to rapidly fill the huge number of actual judicial vacancies (145) as well as vetting potential nominees for the additional (19) federal judges who have announced they are leaving shortly.
If you agree with this message pointing out the need for a sense of urgency, perhaps you should consider helping to advance the message. Attacking/criticizing the existing messengers is not helpful. And that’s something to think about,
‘Well, I hope that you think it is urgent to get our Senators (and the staffers who the President assigned responsibility to round up good nominees) actually focused on the need to rapidly fill the huge number of actual judicial vacancies (145) as well as vetting potential nominees for the additional (19) federal judges who have announced they are leaving shortly.”
I agree.