Could somebody draw me a venn diagram of this argument? I’m not sure how this all fits together.
CC
“... I’m not sure how this all fits together.”
I think that’s the problem liberals have regarding gender.
Lol! Please yes someone draw one, assuming doing so is not the damnable offense of homophobia or transphobia or lgbtbbq-phobia!
Neither am I, and always thought I understood Venn diagrams!
But perhaps here are a few dots ...
* feminists decide they are entitled to special privileges because of their sex.
* sexually confused people redefine "sex" (XX or XY) as "gender", which is based not on chromosomes but on "feelings".
* some male persons decide their "feelings" tell them they are wymmen.
* they then claim the right to invade wymmen space.
* and the winner is: ... the Law of Unintended Consequences.
Ta da!
It’s not a Venn overlap. It’s a hierarchy of whom gets to play the victim card.
Muslims>trans>gay>First Americans(aka Indians)>blacks>women>Hispanic(degreed in accordance with melanin, Cubans at lowest level, unless black)>Asians>atheist>Jews who reject their faith>catholic(but only Catholics who reject their faith for liberalism>white males (including serious Catholics and any Protestant) Jews who embrace their faith and Israelis.
Exceptions: any member of any group that is a conservative drops to the level of Jews who embrace their faith.