Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA Newspaper: Our State's Gun Control Laws Are In Jeopardy
townhall.com ^ | 2/10/2019 | Beth Baumann

Posted on 02/11/2019 7:28:23 AM PST by rktman

A couple weeks ago the Supreme Court made a shocking (but welcomed) announcement: the high court would be hearing the first gun case in a decade. The last time the Supreme Court heard a gun-related case was back in 2008 when they ruled "the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home” in the landmark Heller decision.

What's interesting is the San Francisco Chronicle, a rather liberal newspaper in California, published an editorial admitting that the state's gun control laws may be in danger. While the Supreme Court was reluctant to hear Second Amendment-related cases, the Court now has more conservative justices. Now that Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh are on the Court, gun rights activists are expecting landslide victories that can and will protect the right to keep and bear arms for years to come.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; california; kaba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Don't be so sure until Notorious RBG is replaced. Chief justice is NOT reliable IMHO. But, wouldn't that SUCK for some of Cali's infringements to get tossed in to the sea. Maybe put a hold on other infringements that are taking place across the nation. Just in case, lube any of your items to keep them safe from libtears.
1 posted on 02/11/2019 7:28:23 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

PRINT VERSION:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/02/10/ca-newspaper-our-states-gun-control-laws-are-in-jeopardy-n2541130/print


2 posted on 02/11/2019 7:31:35 AM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I agree with you. This court session will see if Roberts takes on the mantle of "swing vote" and moves even further to the left a result.

The law that SCOTUS agreed to hear is regarding NYC's draconian 'residence permit' that prohibits an owner from taking their firearm outside of the 5 boroughs for any reason. Clearly unconstitutional, but if the ruling is narrow enough it won't affect CA laws at all.

Roberts may force the ruling in this case to be as narrow as possible so as to not affect other state laws.

3 posted on 02/11/2019 7:33:31 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

.……..I think certain people have evidence that Robert’s has committed impeachable offenses. When I say “evidence” I mean the irrefutable kind e.g. wire taps and/or video.

How this plays out is going to be interesting.


4 posted on 02/11/2019 7:41:17 AM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

the San Francisco Chronicle, a rather liberal newspaper in California, published an editorial admitting that the state’s gun control laws may be in danger.
= = =

Rope a dope


5 posted on 02/11/2019 7:53:50 AM PST by Scrambler Bob (You know that I am full of /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas
So it was Roberts and not Kavanaugh with ballzee ford? 😳
6 posted on 02/11/2019 7:55:17 AM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Justice Roberts has been a huge disappointment and is the clearest example of what what was wrong with this country under previous Republican presidents. I didn’t see it at the time because I was so relieved to have a ‘Republican’ in office. What a joke. God bless Donald Trump.

Now - we need to see if RBG is competent to serve. This needs to be challenged now.


7 posted on 02/11/2019 7:56:36 AM PST by Frapster (Trump 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

praying that the S.Ct. returns USA to our Constitutional system of governance.. beginning now with restoring our 2A rights... and going forward from there!!!
When will they finally wheel the RBG corpse out ?
(they can put it under glass like Lenin’s body for all I care... )


8 posted on 02/11/2019 7:57:08 AM PST by faithhopecharity (“Politicians arent born, they’re excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

RBG? Where is she??????????? Room Temperature???


9 posted on 02/11/2019 7:57:11 AM PST by mplc51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The Second Amendment means what it says, regardless of what tyrants in black robes think.


10 posted on 02/11/2019 7:57:55 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

In my opinion, there are 3 categories of rights:

1) Rights which citizens possesses as enumerated in and protected by, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights

2) A subset of those rights are extended to non-citizens or may come with restrictions.

3) A loss of the majority of those rights while a ward of the state such as in the case of mental illness, incarceration or as result of conviction (i.e loss of the right to vote for election tampering, etc)

Anything else is a defacto infringement of a citizen’s rights. But it appears that my opinion is not how liberals or the current legal system views the world.


11 posted on 02/11/2019 8:04:21 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
The last time the Supreme Court heard a gun-related case was back in 2008 when they ruled "the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home” in the landmark Heller decision.

Stating it that way implies to the mind of a gun-controller that it's OK to restrict carry outside of the home. It should have read "such as self-defense". (period)

12 posted on 02/11/2019 8:04:55 AM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51
RBG? Where is she??????????? Room Temperature???

Twitter RUMOR:

DEVELOPING:

White House sources have reported POTUS will deliver a statement at 1pm EST concerning Justice Ginsburg’s #RBG failing health & his next Supreme Court Nomination.

13 posted on 02/11/2019 8:10:56 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

I don’t trust Roberts. I don’t want this SC anywhere near the 2nd. We barely won the last one and Roberts has been moving towards the Rats month by month.


14 posted on 02/11/2019 8:27:28 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Isn’t whatever the leftists control have on Roberts transferable?


15 posted on 02/11/2019 8:39:06 AM PST by Cold Heart (The main purpose of The Wall is to protect the US from its own politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Frapster

Yeah, but who decides competence? I say no but guess that doesn’t count.


16 posted on 02/11/2019 8:41:50 AM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Our State’s Gun Control Laws Are In Jeopardy.

The 60+ gangs in LA county spit and chuckle.


17 posted on 02/11/2019 8:45:18 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Really? I hope so. :)


18 posted on 02/11/2019 8:46:48 AM PST by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind
Just a rumor on Twitter at this point.

We'll find out in a couple hours, I reckon.

🤪


19 posted on 02/11/2019 8:49:11 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bagster

It’s time,,, She is very important and she is AWOL. A welfare check is well in order here.


20 posted on 02/11/2019 8:57:24 AM PST by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson