Replies

Yeah, I read that bs alarmest article, clicked the links in it, and read the stupid WHO study from 2011. No evidence in it. It concludes: Results The evidence was reviewed critically, and overall evaluated as being limited2 among users of wireless telephones for glioma and acoustic neuroma, and inadequate3 to draw conclusions for other types of cancers. The evidence from the occupational and environmental exposures mentioned above was similarly judged inadequate. The Working Group did not quantitate the risk; however, one study of past cell phone use (up to the year 2004), showed a 40% increased risk for gliomas in the highest category of heavy users (reported average: 30 minutes per day over a 10‐year period). Conclusions Dr Jonathan Samet (University of Southern California, USA), overall Chairman of the Working Group, indicated that "the evidence, while still accumulating, is strong enough to support a conclusion and the 2B classification. The conclusion means that there could be some risk, and therefore we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer risk." "Given the potential consequences for public health of this classification and findings," said IARC Director Christopher Wild, "it is important that additional research be conducted into the long‐ term, heavy use of mobile phones. Pending the availability of such information, it is important to take pragmatic measures to reduce exposure such as hands‐free devices or texting. " In other words, no evidence, but not enough studies, so keep studying. One debunked paper from friken 2004 cited, and no others. That was 2011. Since then, many, many studies have been done, and no evidence still of any threat. Because the underlying physics says so. See my previous post above. There. Is. No. Threat. From. 5G. And no credible study yet has shown there is.