Skip to comments.
Massachusetts Bill Would Remove “Mother” and “Unborn Child” From Legal Definition of Pregnancy
Life News ^
| Mar 11, 2019
| Micaiah Bilger
Posted on 03/12/2019 3:16:30 PM PDT by detective
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To avoid any hint that an abortion is a violent, life-destroying act, the bill would remove unborn child and mother from the legal definitions of pregnancy and abortion.
1
posted on
03/12/2019 3:16:30 PM PDT
by
detective
To: detective; All
2
posted on
03/12/2019 3:17:05 PM PDT
by
musicman
(The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
To: detective
Demonic-induced insanity.
3
posted on
03/12/2019 3:18:13 PM PDT
by
Faith
To: detective
To: detective
Another Democrat bill supporting infanticide.
5
posted on
03/12/2019 3:21:38 PM PDT
by
Skywise
To: detective
6
posted on
03/12/2019 3:23:51 PM PDT
by
Old Yeller
(Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
To: detective
Legal Definition of Pregnancy
= = =
That state of evolution where a living body is found on the door step of a fire station.
7
posted on
03/12/2019 3:25:17 PM PDT
by
Scrambler Bob
(You know that I am full of /S)
To: detective; bitt; ZULU; NFHale; hoosiermama; vette6387; rodguy911; celtic gal; Albion Wilde; radu; ..
At what point is this insanity going to be stopped by the outraged American people?
To: detective
No mother? Where did the fetus reside? Or did it just come ex nihilo?
9
posted on
03/12/2019 3:28:13 PM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
To: Rummyfan
So legally speaking, there is no mother, there is no baby, there is no fetus, there is no embryo, there is no father, legally speaking.
What the heck? What is the legal status of the pregnancy? Are we allowed to say that “human being such as such” is pregnant, or is pregnancy itself no longer identified as such?
To: detective
fascinating how these mass-murdering Nazis in Taxachusetts try to cover up their heinous crimes (with NewSpeak, non-violent vocabulary)
Just like their mentors the German Nazis did in WW2
11
posted on
03/12/2019 3:36:03 PM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: Rummyfan
The who?, The what? If there’s no who or what then there’s no need to fund planned parenthood now is there?
12
posted on
03/12/2019 3:37:29 PM PDT
by
Waverunner
(I'd like to welcome our new overlords, say hello to my little friend)
To: musicman
Ive thought about this before. If it isnt a BABY then there cant be a mother. So women are now unviable tissue containers and all liberal women should be referred to as such.
13
posted on
03/12/2019 3:39:41 PM PDT
by
jdsteel
(Americans are Dreamers too!!!)
To: detective
George Orwell has to be loving this. He was right on the money.
To: detective
I would say it is Orwellian, but it was Huxley who predicted that the word “mother” would be banned.
15
posted on
03/12/2019 3:46:04 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Faith
What are they going to call them? Host and spawn?
Disgusting. The left is attempting to dehumanize humans.
16
posted on
03/12/2019 4:18:52 PM PDT
by
cld51860
(Volo pro veritas)
To: jdsteel
This ought to produce some interesting medical write ups for the insurance companies.
To: detective
To: detective
To: detective
The good people of Massachusetts need a word for “someone or something that bears a child”. Wouldn’t that be useful? If only the English language would provide one!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson