Folks,
Trump might win the popular vote, then what?
If he does that In spite of losing the electoral college and these laws put him in office I will laugh and cheer.
But it’s still wrong and the Dems WILL attempt to rig the election.
R’s in Cali and NY have a reason to vote now. Only good consequence of this.
Then the Dems will develop amnesia. Their calls to toss the electoral college will be forgotten.
Here’s a thought: what if all the high-density blue areas were nothing but rich white people? Because only uber-rich white people can afford to live there & pay astronomical taxes and housing costs?
Wait, aren’t those area pretty much turning into that now?
Good question, and he most likely did win the popular vote when the illegal count is removed. . .
Read the article below, it is not that lengthy and includes proof that illegals voted in the millions AND changed the Electoral College count. The “real” popular vote count will prove Trump likely did receive more votes than hillary.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/did-votes-by-noncitizens-cost-trump-the-2016-popular-vote-sure-looks-that-way/ (Investor’s Business Daily)
“Did Votes By Noncitizens Cost Trump The 2016 Popular Vote? Sure Looks That Way”
From a Harvard study: “Now comes a new study by Just Facts, a libertarian/conservative think tank, that used data from a large Harvard/You.Gov study that every two years samples tens of thousands of voters, including some who admit they are noncitizens and thus can’t vote legally. . . The findings are eye-opening. In 2008, as many as 5.7 million noncitizens voted in the election. In 2012, as many as 3.6 million voted, the study said.”
And of course, https://www.justfactsdaily.com/substantial-numbers-of-non-citizens-vote-illegally-in-u-s-elections/ also provides details and a level of proof that is ignored by partisan hacks, like the MSM, democrats and never-trumpers.
Just Facts Daily provides scholarly facts and analysis of the vote that prove Trump and others were correct that Illegals voted in the millions:
“The Electoral Studies Paper
In 2014, the academic journal Electoral Studies published a paper by three scholars who analyzed the results of a large survey conducted by a group at Harvard University. This study also made use of polling data from YouGov and voter registration and turnout data from Catalist, a firm that equips “progressive organizations” with data to help them “persuade and mobilize” people.
In this 2008 survey of 32,800 respondents, 339 identified themselves as non-citizens, and 38 of these non-citizens checked a box that said “I definitely voted” in the 2008 general election or were recorded in the Catalist database as voting in that election. At face value, this means that 11.2% (38/339) of non-citizens voted in the 2008 election.
Applying this 11.2% figure to the Census Bureau’s estimate of 19.4 million adult non-citizens in the U.S., this amounts to 2.2 million non-citizens who voted illegally in the 2008 election. After weighting these results and accounting for margins of error, the authors estimated that a maximum of 2.8 million non-citizens voted in 2008.”
A scholarly report from Electoral Studies. prove3s illegals did and have voted before and their votes likely changed the Electoral count: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379414000973
Some highlights from the study:
“First use of representative sample to measure non-citizen voting in USA.
Some non-citizens cast votes in U.S. elections despite legal bans.
Non-citizens favor Democratic candidates over Republican candidates.
Non-citizen voting likely changed 2008 outcomes including Electoral College votes and the composition of Congress.
Voter photo-identification rules have limited effect on non-citizen participation.”
The allegation of illegals voting in the millions has been poo-pooed and mocked by many, they simply close their mind to the facts.