Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: irishjuggler

Absolutely unconstitutional, but the conventional wisdom at the moment is that it’s moot because they don’t have a path to 270. Someone did an analysis a few weeks ago and said this thing is going to top out around 206.
...
Do you see a problem if the governor States after the election that the EVs were awarded Dem due to popular vote even if Dems lose 2020? If precedent is set and allowed to stand, then we have a dead country walking.


24 posted on 03/30/2019 10:48:01 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (But the noble man makes noble plans, and by noble deeds they stand. Isaiah 32:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: CincyRichieRich

I absolutely see multiple problems with this scheme, but by its own terms this “compact” doesn’t kick in unless participating states amount to 270 or more.


30 posted on 03/30/2019 10:58:18 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson