Posted on 04/10/2019 8:48:46 AM PDT by detective
Notice that the Pest’s article quotes Philips as making the accusation against Sandmann. The fact that Philups SAID those things is just that: a fact. The paper can’t be held liable for quoting a charge made by someone else.
In other words, while Sandmann may have a case for slander against Philips, his case for libel against the Pest is weaker.
That said, it is incumbent on the paper to fairly assess the validity of any slanderous charges before quoting them. Otherwise they can be liable for propagatng the slander.
WP should keep that legal team-those they malign will most appreciative.
I’m sure Mr. L. Lin Wood is very impressed with the Compost’s filing.
Bust Bezos balls
So, the WaPo was really praising the Covington kids and the MAGA message. Who knew?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.