Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/15/2019 8:08:06 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Trump20162020

“New Zealand’s chief censor David Shanks“

How very 1984.

L


2 posted on 04/15/2019 8:10:56 PM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020

George Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm were supposed to be cautionary tales, not how to books. New Zealand has now officially gone over to the dark side.


5 posted on 04/15/2019 8:20:06 PM PDT by rllngrk33 (Time for all patriotic Americans to boycott liberals and all SJW/PC bullsh*t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020

Who needs muslims when you’ve got fascists in the government?


8 posted on 04/15/2019 8:25:54 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020
I actually watched one of the banned vids.

Hilarious!

Made the bomb magnet lady look almost believable.

9 posted on 04/15/2019 8:31:41 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020

‘Wrong think’.
Yea, I saved it.


10 posted on 04/15/2019 8:36:06 PM PDT by glasseye ("24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think not." ~ H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020

Rolling Stone celebrating censorship they approve of.


12 posted on 04/15/2019 8:45:25 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020
They’re being charged with supplying or distributing objectionable material, which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.

14 years for "distributing objectionable material."

lol... wut?

14 posted on 04/15/2019 9:05:10 PM PDT by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020
[...] an act that bans the dissemination of "objectionable" content, defined as content that [...] Of the video footage specifically, Shanks said, "every New Zealander should now be clear that this clip is an illegal, harmful and reprehensible record created to promote a terrorist cause. If you have a record of it, you must delete it."

Illegal to DISSEMINATE, or also to merely POSSESS? Which is it?

Also: Talke about overly broad prohibitions!

Regards,

15 posted on 04/15/2019 9:11:19 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020

This makes sense.

Were the video legal and popular, NZ public attitudes might shift in a direction impeding full destruction of Western Civ there:

Things are still early in the incubation period in NZ.

The aim is for the two large Abrahamic Religions to destroy one another.

And then another group will be able to create Heaven On Earth, fiiinally get socialism right, now that they have the right people and computers, dance around the golden calf, etc.


17 posted on 04/15/2019 9:47:53 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020

I wonder if they have a guy named Winston Smith in the government archives, feverishly slaving away to make sure no unallowed truths slip out?


24 posted on 04/15/2019 10:33:30 PM PDT by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020

To think I would like to have moved to New Zealand if things continued to get worse in the U.S.

As bad as it is here it’s better than that socialist paradise.The people have No Rights.


25 posted on 04/15/2019 11:49:45 PM PDT by puppypusher ( The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020
If it's jihadis...or jihadi sympathizers...doing it then 14 years sounds pretty lenient.If it's normal,respectable people then I'd lament the fact that New Zealand doesn't have a 1st Amendment.

I saw the video....it's breathtakingly cruel and gruesome.But it didn't make me wanna go out and do the same thing...or encourage others to do so.But then again I'm reasonably normal.

27 posted on 04/16/2019 3:29:04 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Mitt Romney: Bringing Massachusetts Values To The Great State Of Utah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020
Shortly after the attacks, New Zealand’s chief censor David Shanks issued a statement announcing that the shooter’s manifesto and footage had been banned under the Films Videos and Publications Classification Act (FVPCA) 1993, an act that bans the dissemination of “objectionable” content, defined as content that “describes, depicts, expresses, or otherwise deals with matters such as sex, horror, crime, cruelty, or violence in such a manner that the availability of the publication is likely to be injurious to the public good.”

So does New Zealand also ban sex education films, Peter Jackson's early horror movies, and crime mysteries, then? Or do they just pull out this vague "law" when it suits them.

29 posted on 04/16/2019 4:10:33 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson