To: Trump20162020
New Zealands chief censor David Shanks
How very 1984.
L
2 posted on
04/15/2019 8:10:56 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: Trump20162020
George Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm were supposed to be cautionary tales, not how to books. New Zealand has now officially gone over to the dark side.
5 posted on
04/15/2019 8:20:06 PM PDT by
rllngrk33
(Time for all patriotic Americans to boycott liberals and all SJW/PC bullsh*t.)
To: Trump20162020
Who needs muslims when you’ve got fascists in the government?
8 posted on
04/15/2019 8:25:54 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: Trump20162020
I actually watched one of the banned vids.
Hilarious!
Made the bomb magnet lady look almost believable.
9 posted on
04/15/2019 8:31:41 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
("All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
To: Trump20162020
‘Wrong think’.
Yea, I saved it.
10 posted on
04/15/2019 8:36:06 PM PDT by
glasseye
("24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think not." ~ H. L. Mencken)
To: Trump20162020
Rolling Stone celebrating censorship they approve of.
12 posted on
04/15/2019 8:45:25 PM PDT by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: Trump20162020
Theyre being charged with supplying or distributing objectionable material, which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. 14 years for "distributing objectionable material."
lol... wut?
14 posted on
04/15/2019 9:05:10 PM PDT by
AAABEST
(NY/DC/LA media/political industrial complex DELENDA EST)
To: Trump20162020
[...] an act that bans the dissemination of "objectionable" content, defined as content that [...] Of the video footage specifically, Shanks said, "every New Zealander should now be clear that this clip is an illegal, harmful and reprehensible record created to promote a terrorist cause. If you have a record of it, you must delete it."Illegal to DISSEMINATE, or also to merely POSSESS? Which is it?
Also: Talke about overly broad prohibitions!
Regards,
15 posted on
04/15/2019 9:11:19 PM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: Trump20162020
This makes sense.
Were the video legal and popular, NZ public attitudes might shift in a direction impeding full destruction of Western Civ there:
Things are still early in the incubation period in NZ.
The aim is for the two large Abrahamic Religions to destroy one another.
And then another group will be able to create Heaven On Earth, fiiinally get socialism right, now that they have the right people and computers, dance around the golden calf, etc.
17 posted on
04/15/2019 9:47:53 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: Trump20162020
I wonder if they have a guy named Winston Smith in the government archives, feverishly slaving away to make sure no unallowed truths slip out?
24 posted on
04/15/2019 10:33:30 PM PDT by
Sir_Ed
To: Trump20162020
To think I would like to have moved to New Zealand if things continued to get worse in the U.S.
As bad as it is here its better than that socialist paradise.The people have No Rights.
25 posted on
04/15/2019 11:49:45 PM PDT by
puppypusher
( The world is going to the dogs.)
To: Trump20162020
If it's jihadis...or jihadi sympathizers...doing it then 14 years sounds pretty lenient.If it's normal,respectable people then I'd lament the fact that New Zealand doesn't have a 1st Amendment.
I saw the video....it's breathtakingly cruel and gruesome.But it didn't make me wanna go out and do the same thing...or encourage others to do so.But then again I'm reasonably normal.
27 posted on
04/16/2019 3:29:04 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Mitt Romney: Bringing Massachusetts Values To The Great State Of Utah.)
To: Trump20162020
Shortly after the attacks, New Zealands chief censor David Shanks issued a statement announcing that the shooters manifesto and footage had been banned under the Films Videos and Publications Classification Act (FVPCA) 1993, an act that bans the dissemination of objectionable content, defined as content that describes, depicts, expresses, or otherwise deals with matters such as sex, horror, crime, cruelty, or violence in such a manner that the availability of the publication is likely to be injurious to the public good.So does New Zealand also ban sex education films, Peter Jackson's early horror movies, and crime mysteries, then? Or do they just pull out this vague "law" when it suits them.
29 posted on
04/16/2019 4:10:33 PM PDT by
Fedora
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson