1. The Supreme Court has ruled that if there is no underlying crime, the investigated cannot be accused of obstruction for having pushed back in any way.
2. Therefore, the entire report regarding obstruction should not exist.
3. The obstruction findings amount to nothing more than innuendo and uncorroborated hearsay.......and it came from a prosecutor?
4. The only possible purpose of the obstruction loose talk is to fire up a political attack.......and it came from a prosecutor?
5. From the beginning it was known that the Dept. of Justice would not indict a sitting President. So the only point of the entire investigation had to be to entrap the President’s associates in perjury traps.
Well said.
You’ve probably heard what Mark Levin had to say about this on Fox News but if not it’s worth looking at, he really rips the report. Mark starts at 40 seconds.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnhN31hOgKM
HOORAY Tom Fitton. Good posts. Mark did tear it up. Thanks for the link.